And I give this document the same 'a one chance in 42.3518 tetraquadrillion to the power 84' that it's authentic.
Now you can defent your forgery and I can defend mine.
Do you realize, that even if the COLB is a forgery, (which I give about a one chance in 42.3518 tetraquadrillion to the power 84.) that the COLB is MORE EVIDENCE than any birther has presented?
That’s right. That one piece of paper is more evidence that any birther has presented to date to the best of my knowledge. And, I think I am right because I have begged and pleaded for some birther to present some logically formatted presentation of the birther claims without result.
parsy, who heard a rumor about thebirthers and moon-landing deniers were merging, but personally doubts
One is less than many, but then your twisted logic explains why you keep ending up on the wrong side of the arguments.
I think it’s odd for you to say that you would consider my claims if I put it in the format you want me to put it in. You’re a capable person; I don’t think that format of presentation should make any difference.
What the DOH and OIP have confirmed is that the best evidence they have regarding Obama’s birth claims is not prima facie evidence. It’s not just a deal where they’ve shown the Factcheck COLB to be a forgery. What they’ve shown is that even what they DO have is insufficient to prove the claims regarding Obama’s birth.
That’s a pretty serious defect there. Especially since in Hawaii they had THREE MONTHS to get the information in without any penalty. Why didn’t Ann take her baby for a check-up within the first 3 months after the birth? (Besides the fact that, contrary to Obama’s books and official narrative, Ann was in Washington State a couple weeks after Obama’s birth)
There were relatively few items absolutely required on a birth certificate in 1961. If Ann and the baby had gone in for an exam within 3 months of the birth the doctor could have provided what was needed on the certificate but wasn’t provided by Ann (or whoever swore to having knowledge regarding the facts of the birth).
And I give this document the same 'a one chance in 42.3518 tetraquadrillion to the power 84' that it's authentic.
Now you can defent your forgery and I can defend mine.
And, I think I am right because I have begged and pleaded for some birther to present some logically formatted presentation of the birther claims without result.
_______________________
GET LOST YOU EFFING OBOT! YOU ARE TRYING TO GET SOMEONE TO TALK SO YOU KNOW WHAT THEY HAVE SO YOU CAN HELP THE MARXIST KENYAN, YOU ARE DESPICABLE YOU LOW LIFE POS.