[parsifal]

BUT.....There was decision in Nov. or Dec. 2009 which relied heavily on Wong. I feel comfy with Wong!

The Indiana case:

http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/11120903.ebb.pdf

For some reason, the “Birther” guys, did not mention Wong and relied on Vattel, etc....However, the Court reminded them about that little Wong sitting out there...all alone.....and waiting for the Birthers....

parsy, who thinks Wong is Wight

[DJ MacWoW]

I have no comments on Wong. You said :edge19 and bp2 are both on timeout until they read Wong. and I was only telling you that was done the summer of '08.

[patlin]

And, why don't you go on and tell the folks that the Indiana ruling is not precedent setting for constitutional purposes?

No lower court rulings are. They are only precedent if they reach the SCOTUS and the SCOTUS upholds those rulings.

So I say, let's get the case before the SCOTUS.

[Red Steel]

The Indiana court's opinion uses as their "crown jewel" the NBC comment (seen below) right before they hold to dismiss the case in the next sentence.

The comment comes from an INS case that is unsupportable by any Supreme Court precedence. It's a comment out of the blue, which I suspect, was spoken by the alien's lawyer to elicit emotional appeal to get the case reopened and that a liberal judge felt pity who placed it in his opinion. Furthermore, the Indiana court never said categorically that Wong Ark or Barack Obama are natural born citizens.

Here is my last post to you below as it seems things need to be repeated to you over and over again:

------------

Friday, February 26, 2010 2:20:21 AM · 1,250 of 1,408
Red Steel to parsifal; BP2; DoctorBulldog; mojitojoe; Fred Nerks; bgill

Taking a closer look at that Indiana court decision.

Which says "...see also, e.g., Diaz-Salazar v. I.N.S., 700 F.2d 1156, 1160 (7th Cir. 1983) (noting in its recitation of the facts that despite the fact father was not a citizen of the United States, he had children who were “natural-born citizens of the United States”)"

http://openjurist.org/700/f2d/1156

These Indiana judges concluded by using an INS deportation case to quote in their dismissal which was accepted as fact by the sitting circuit Judge Cudahy, appointed by Jimmy Carter, that is irrelevant to his deportation case. The NBC statement probably originally came from some ill-informed paralegal who worked for the lawyer of the illegal alien.

You've got to be kidding me Parsy if you think this Indiana court case, you love to post, could really stand up to any scrutiny. These guys threw ink to paper just to sweep this case under the rug. If I can shoot holes in it from the early hours in the morning think of what a good team would do with it. It is pure folly barely worth the paper it's written on.

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1222 | View Replies