[patlin]

And, why don't you go on and tell the folks that the Indiana ruling is not precedent setting for constitutional purposes?

No lower court rulings are. They are only precedent if they reach the SCOTUS and the SCOTUS upholds those rulings.

So I say, let's get the case before the SCOTUS.

[parsifal]

Already have. But the fact that it used Wong, shows the trend and that Wong is still considered GOOD LAW. If Wong were BAD LAW, the Court would not have cited it. And the reasoning is important. Judges do not like being overturned. If the judge had thought Wong was suspect or flaky law, he would have found some other way to drop kick the birthers out the door.

Birthers, LEARN TO LIVE WITH WONG!

parsy, who says this is too easy....bzzzz...bzzzz