Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: BP2

I’m going to do you like edge19. No more responses on Wong, UNTIL YOU READ WONG.

Until then, I am wasting my time trying to straighten you out. You are just ramblng around grabbing bits and pieces of things and stumbling all over yourself. While it is funny to watch, the sad thing is that you are only hurting yourself. You’re wasting my time, and the time of others, but you are hurting yourself.

It is obvious that you do not have a clue about case law, how to read a case, what the parts of the case are, and even what LAW is. You can learn these things, Grasshopper, but first you will have to make the sound of one hand clapping.

Then you have to listen and learn. THEN, AND ONLY THEN, you can make meaningful contributions to the discussion. Until that point, you are pretty much stuck in the “I don’t know much about the law, so can you explain______” phase.

Your “s” argument is laughable. Your Blackstone statement borders on bizarre. You will continue in this course until you shut up, read the case, and then ask for help.

parsy, who thinks you are a smart person, and capable of improvement


1,373 posted on 02/26/2010 12:26:16 PM PST by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1367 | View Replies ]


To: parsifal
THEN, AND ONLY THEN, you can make meaningful contributions to the discussion.

You post a comment on the average of very few minutes between different threads and I have yet to see even one meaningful contribution from you.

If you are sooooo smart, why are 99.9% of all your comments mere trashing of someones argument rather than credible debate.

And for the record, repeatedly posting the same old ‘cut & paste’ tidbits from your washed up traffic law clerk's site is not considered as credible contribution.

“The Dudette” who has just finished with

Alexander Porter Morse's 1881 treatise on: “citizenship, by birth and by naturalization, with reference to the law of nations, Roman civil law, law of the United States of America, and the law of France; including provisions in the federal Constitution, and in the several state constitutions, in respect of citizenship; together with decisions thereon of the federal and state courts”

and I recommend it to all patriots who wish to debate these DRONES who are unable to function on any shred of independent thought. They only know how to cut and paste from their masters sites.

http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924020027870

1,390 posted on 02/26/2010 1:12:11 PM PST by patlin (1st SCOTUS of USA: "Human life, from its commencement to its close, is protected by the common law.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1373 | View Replies ]

To: parsifal; All


Parsley: "I know I'm wrong, but I'm going to pretend that I'm not!"

1,420 posted on 02/26/2010 1:58:56 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1373 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson