You post a comment on the average of very few minutes between different threads and I have yet to see even one meaningful contribution from you.
If you are sooooo smart, why are 99.9% of all your comments mere trashing of someones argument rather than credible debate.
And for the record, repeatedly posting the same old ‘cut & paste’ tidbits from your washed up traffic law clerk's site is not considered as credible contribution.
“The Dudette” who has just finished with
Alexander Porter Morse's 1881 treatise on: “citizenship, by birth and by naturalization, with reference to the law of nations, Roman civil law, law of the United States of America, and the law of France; including provisions in the federal Constitution, and in the several state constitutions, in respect of citizenship; together with decisions thereon of the federal and state courts”
and I recommend it to all patriots who wish to debate these DRONES who are unable to function on any shred of independent thought. They only know how to cut and paste from their masters sites.
The Disrespectful Drone says, Most of what you said is wrong and not worthy of response. You are just peeved because you couldn’t smack me around on the Birther stuff.
The one thing you did say that is worth response is:
” Alexander Porter Morse’s 1881 treatise on: “citizenship, by birth and by naturalization, with reference to the law of nations, Roman civil law, law of the United States of America, and the law of France; including provisions in the federal Constitution, and in the several state constitutions, in respect of citizenship; together with decisions thereon of the federal and state courts”
and I recommend it to all patriots who wish to debate these DRONES”
No, birthers. Don’t waste your time. Not unless you enjoy reading for the joy of reading. Lookie at a calendar. 1881 is BEFORE 1898 by 17 years. 1898 is when Wong was decided.
Which is later? I submit 1898, but when one is debating with birthers, one can never be sure such things will be accepted without much argument and distress. That book isn’t LAW. It will never be LAW. Wong is LAW and will be until, if ever, it is overturned.
Since Wong was cited, as good law, only a few months ago, and used to determine that Obama was a natural born citizen, Wong is probably going to be a lot better read.
parsy, who is buzzing in defiance of the Queen Bee!