Well, you've certainly fallen for the intentional double-speak. Director Fukino did not cite an official birth document to back up her claim of Hawaiian birth. This is signficant. The ONLY documents in that office that legally verify birth for Obama would have to be an original, doctor-signed birth certificate. She said they have an original birth certicate on file, but she carefully avoided citing this same document as the source of her claim. Additionally, she made a statement that is NOT contained on ANY official document maintained by her department ... that of claiming anyone to be a 'natural-born American citizen.' Because of this, her statement loses a great deal of credibility. Second, the DOH has repeatedly said that disclosing ANY information from the birth records is illegal. If it's illegal, then she can't say Obama was born in Hawaii. If, on the other hand, she has legal authority to dislose the place of birth, then she would have the SAME legal authority to identify which documents supposably verify this claim. In such case, she could have specifically identified the birth certificate as the source of her confirmation. She did not do so. In fact, she made it very clear that her other public statement about the original birth certificate was a completely separate statement.
That, and the fact that there is no evidence to suggest that the records of the said department are incorrect.
There is no evidence that the records of the said department ARE correct. That's why skeptics want to see proof. If the evidence is legit, then there's no harm in showing it.
Correct. She cited the state's official vital records.
This is signficant. The ONLY documents in that office that legally verify birth for Obama would have to be an original, doctor-signed birth certificate.
Not true. Official state vital records are sufficient to prove birth in the US before any court of law or government agency.
Additionally, she made a statement that is NOT contained on ANY official document maintained by her department ... that of claiming anyone to be a 'natural-born American citizen.'
LOL. Her department records show he was born on US soil, which in the common understanding means he's a natural born citizen.
Because of this, her statement loses a great deal of credibility. There is no evidence that the records of the said department ARE correct.
State vital records are presumed accurate until proven otherwise.