Do me a favor on the Wong case. Do not post anything else to me again until you have read the case. Period. I do not want to take you to raise and spoon feed you every two seconds because you are too lazy to read the friggin’ case.
I am more than willing to help anyone who has questions, but I have posted the relevant parts of the case over and over and over, and every time one of you guys mis-reads some part of the case or the post, or misunderstands what I have said to you, here you come with a “Gotcha” that ain’t really a gotcha.
Read the thing first, understand it, and if AFTER YOU DO THAT, you have a valid question, please let me know. This isn’t kindergarten, and I don’t have time to keep wiping your noses for you.
parsy, who says “Grow up!”
Here’s another pretentious futility game. Parsy demands that I read the case, ignoring that I posted specific citations from the same case supporting my arugment, while simultaneously destroying his citations that he didn’t bother to read or comprehend himself. Must say: it was a brilliant case of multitasking on my part.