Here’s another pretentious futility game. Parsy demands that I read the case, ignoring that I posted specific citations from the same case supporting my arugment, while simultaneously destroying his citations that he didn’t bother to read or comprehend himself. Must say: it was a brilliant case of multitasking on my part.
BULLSH*T! You keep stumbling over the language. And I presented you with the language so I know what you have. You have a choice. You can be lazy, and refuse to read the case, or you can be productive and read the case upon which the NBC issue will turn, if it ever gets to court.
If you choose to be lazy, that is YOUR choice. Just quit bugging me with dumb questions, dumb observations, and dumb “gotchas” on a case you don’t know crap about. Is that unreasonable? Me expecting you to read the case you want to make comments about?
parsy, who don’t think so