Credibility? BP2? My point to him:
“Or, are YOU really so clueless that you think if the Birther issue ever makes it to court, that having a mob of people shouting “Obama’s A Liar” is going to pass for a legal argument.”
That’s the point. Credibility is nice, and I like it. It’s really cool if your opponent in court doesn’t have any. BUT IT IS NOT POSITIVE EVIDENCE. Do you think anyone can go to court, wave around the COLB,and say “Obama’s a liar!”, and the judge is going to slam his gavel down and say “You win! And I’m going to nominate you for Lawyer of the Year!”
This is childish. It is childish thinking. It is a childish view of the law.
What you, bp2, and the rest of the birthers need to realize—is that regardless of Obama’s credibility, YOU BIRTHERS HAVE ZERO CREDIBILITY.
It is why you get bounced from court. It is why people like Ann Coulter and Glen Beck, neither of whom are exactly masters of impulse control, think Birthers are quacks, and cranks, and the “fringe”. It is why so many other freepers give you hell.
I do not say that to hurt your feelings. I’ve given you suggestions how you might go about trying to develop credibility—by developing a credible case with logical presentation of any evidence you think you have.
Frankly, I haven’t seen any remotely credible evidence of anything, but that’s why I ain’t a birther. I think if you start to lay your “evidence” out, you, or some of you, will realize that you ain’t got a case and will then go on to become productive freepers again.
parsy, who says its your friends who tell you what you don’t want to hear
“Frankly, I haven’t seen any remotely credible evidence of anything”
If 2 official UIPA request responses from the HDOH - each of which confirms that what is on the Factcheck COLB cannot be true - is not “remotely credible evidence of anything”, then there is nothing more I can do for you, parsy.
As more people become aware of the facts, this issue is rising in credibility. And Obama’s credibility and favorability rating is plummeting.
Just out of curiosity, what is it that keeps you from simply rolling your eyes at us stupid “birthers” and moving on to what you think are more pressing or credible issues?
Gosh, I thought it was because of "Standing" and "justicibility".
Silly me. Even though I think the courts have been wrong in applying those rules, those were the reasons given for not letting any case get to the "evidence" phase.
by developing a credible case with logical presentation of any evidence
__________________
Pssstttt.......the case is already there..... the evidence is there and building and NO, Orly isn’t invited. There is no way that you or anyone that reads FR is going to get the info. So fish away, the people in the know aren’t telling you or anyone jack sh*t.