DOH indirectly confirms: Factcheck COLB date filed and certificate number impossible

Butterdezillion | Feb 23, 2010 | Butterdezillion

[EnderWiggins]

In the English language , one usually needs actual questions.

[KenyanBCPunkster]

Then optimize it and change the format to a .jpg, you can do that can't you?

The whole point of using the original TIF file was to put out an image of a level of quality that has not been made public before.

[KenyanBCPunkster]

Did you take it or get it from another source?

I took the photograph.

[KenyanBCPunkster]

Maybe you and your buddy should read names on the document.

I have read the names on the document. I put them there.

What is the question you have about the names?

[KenyanBCPunkster]

IS THIS THE DOCUMENT WITH E F LAVENDER ON IT It was a simple question. Anyone who has actually read it would know.

Of course it's the document with E.F. Lavender on it. Ender had already posted a lower resolution JPG image of it earlier.

[DJ MacWoW]

Guess again wiggy. You and your buddy can’t understand a simple question without prompts.

[EnderWiggins]

I posted the JPEG, and the TIF is available for your download. I have no intention of optimizing anything. The TIF is completely untouched.

[DJ MacWoW]

The preface “You mean” signals a question.

[Darksheare]

If you couldn’t understand it, then this is too advanced for you.

[Las Vegas Ron]

I took the photograph.

And you don't have PS to optimize the file so it can be posted?

Some "photographer" you are.

Quit wasting our time, troll.

[DJ MacWoW]

It took 3 damn pages for you to get it?! Did Wiggy have to explain it?

[EnderWiggins]

"The preface “You mean” signals a question.

No... it signals an assertion. A question mark signals a question.

[Darksheare]

Ack, arugula, it needs to be included in the contracts.
Make it a sticking point for the contract so that the trolls can then picket over pointless nonsense.
(Like the UAW does over pointless nonsense.)

[DJ MacWoW]

It was obviously a question. You and your buddy are the ONLY ones who didn’t get it. I wonder why......

[Darksheare]

Because it points out a flaw in their assertion that punkster originated the document.

[Fred Nerks]

...yep, while they communicate through the hole in their cubicle and read back through the FR threads to see who F.E. Lavender was; the Victorian United Law Clerk’s Society Secretary, the organisation which ultimately became the Victorian Law Review, with associations to the Harvard Law Review with a history of exchange students between the two. The more they try to cover up, the more links they will expose...and burn their fingers.

[EnderWiggins]

LOL... and yet, no one has addressed the simple fact that the TIF posted is the single highest quality image of Orly’s BC that has ever been posted on-line, and therefore can only have come from the originator.

[DJ MacWoW]

Neither of them knew who Lavender was. That’s obvious.

[Las Vegas Ron]

Make it a sticking point for the contract so that the trolls can then picket over pointless nonsense. .

It's either that or Shelly's garden!

[butterdezillion]

Ender has already been shown to be a liar. The whole “Punk’d” story was fake. The supposed Australian BC it was copied from was created AFTER the Kenyan BC was already posted.

If we ignore him he might go away.