On the contrary, the whole issue is very divisive and everyone knows it and every one can see what you're up to.
The *Christianity* of the individual of any member of any particular denomination is not relevant to the topic of the ToE nor the topic of this thread, no matter how you paint it nor how many contortions you and your cohorts put yourselves through to try to justify it.
In the end, the only purpose that asking a question like that can and does serve, is to pit one person against another by getting them into an argument about what a *real* Christian is while evos sit back and laugh at the debacle.
All you evos who are hopping on this bandwagon are not fooling anyone.
No, I disagree. You base your opposition to evolution on your Christianity, but you won’t define it. Are Catholics Christians? Most Catholics support evolution.
Your answer is not a distraction—it is the kernal of your argument.
Answer, please.
That was not the question. The question was whether your 'Christian' movement defined Catholics as non-Christians.