Me: “Here we have an article posted by the writer that compares Darwin to Hitler and Obama and company and you are upset because we ask a few innocent questions.”
You: Cite the post # and the quote where I compare Darwin to Hitler and demonstrate your logic.
Cite the post # and the quote where ANYONE accused you of comparing Darwin to Hitler. Can you read?
I see. I am not the writer to whom you refer. Whew! That was close. For a moment, I thought I was being held to account for something I had written in a parallel life.
”Can you read?”
Yes I can. But I can see where someone, who has never made an error in reading, would not understand how such an error could possibly happen.
“Here we have an article posted by the writer that compares Darwin to Hitler and Obama and company and you are upset because we ask a few innocent questions.”
I’m not upset. It takes things like flying very large jets at very high speeds into very tall buildings (or attempts to control every waking moment of my life) to upset me. This is a debate forum (hopefully civil to some degree, at least). There are no innocents here (or innocent questions). Everything is done to advance an argument. And, that’s as it should be. You’ve been told what you need to do if you want to push your agenda with a particular issue. That you won’t do it, indicates the sincerity of your intentions.