To: Fred Nerks; hoosiermama
Yes, the notification was left on Barak's door for 10 days (starting Jan 30, 1964) in Cambridge before the post office picked it up and returned it to Hawaii. It was not signed by Barak, nor did he show up for court -- this was explained to me from a court clerk and PI who acquired the papers. Therefore, the divorce was granted by default.
9,307 posted on
08/14/2009 6:48:50 PM PDT by
BP2
(I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
To: BP2
To: BP2
It’s signed “Barack” not “Barak” — who filled out the name, if he did not sign it?
To: BP2
Where is the proof and I mean proof, that they knew each other, shared the same class, lived together, and were married.
9,314 posted on
08/14/2009 7:02:43 PM PDT by
mojitojoe
(All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for the people to remain silent.)
To: BP2
Ive never seen those. Added to my files and thank you very much for posting them.
9,315 posted on
08/14/2009 7:03:38 PM PDT by
mojitojoe
(All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for the people to remain silent.)
To: BP2
Yes, and see how the first name is spelled on that form...looks to me like Barak...not Barack. If that is the case why are the divorce papers different?
9,327 posted on
08/14/2009 7:38:20 PM PDT by
shield
(A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
