To: Salamander
No, this is a very bad photoshop job of the original photograph, and I can only assume it was posted to confuse the issue.
There are NO tears etc. This was aall done digitally to the original photograph.
No one should give this document a second look. It IS a forgery of the original photograph.
Let’s stay focused on ths one, folks. Don’t swing at the DUmmies curve balls.
To: John Valentine
No, this is a very bad photoshop job of the original photograph, and I can only assume it was posted to confuse the issue.
IMO It looks like a poor photoshop job designed to make the 'type' and seal pop out. More readable. Yes, people should ignore it.
894 posted on
08/02/2009 6:20:51 AM PDT by
Electric Graffiti
(Yonder stands your orphan with his gun)
To: John Valentine
To: John Valentine
and I can only assume it was posted to confuse the issue.Exactly John! The second is a crude attempt to FUD this up. The idiot reporters of MSM will point to the second one to PROVE that the first one is fake.
899 posted on
08/02/2009 6:22:12 AM PDT by
MrDem
(From Morning in America to Mourning in America...)
To: John Valentine
What are your thoughts about "MH MIller" and "EF Lavender"?
It should be possible to discover if those are the names of officials in the administration of the Colony of Kenya.
903 posted on
08/02/2009 6:23:31 AM PDT by
Jim Noble
(I hope Sarah will start a 2nd party soon)
To: John Valentine
1,693 posted on
08/02/2009 9:36:24 AM PDT by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson