Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Virginian308
Just out of morbid curiosity, now that we have sketchy documentation from Hawaii (mostly unverified), and ostensibly false information attributed to Kenya, why do we simply accept the birthday of Aug 4th?

I suggest April 1st as a good working hypothesis.

7,786 posted on 08/07/2009 12:24:16 AM PDT by Swordmaker (remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7784 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker; Virginian308
Virginian308

Just out of morbid curiosity, now that we have sketchy documentation from Hawaii (mostly unverified), and ostensibly false information attributed to Kenya, why do we simply accept the birthday of Aug 4th?

Swordmaker

I suggest April 1st as a good working hypothesis.

I'm kind of partial to July 24th - When I worked with the numbers on the pregnancy calculator at www.amazingpregnancy.com, it appears that Barack Obama would have been conceived on October 31 ;-)

Maybe this pic is not so far off the mark...

7,788 posted on 08/07/2009 12:57:56 AM PDT by GizmosAndGadgets (If at first you don't succeed...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7786 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson