[Polarik]

Everyone who knows me (which leaves you out) knows that I was rendering an opinion.

They also know that I’ve been offline working on other things.

If I was going to do a analysis, it would be a complete one, and I would never be on here reporting what the CONSENSUS of a group discussion had been.

I would be giving MY complete analysis and findings.

I work alone.

In my OPINION, the timing of this document is suspect. I hope it’s real. But, it comes out right at the peak of an allout, anti-birther blitzkrieg by the media and the alternate media.

I do not have a dog in this hunt. Look elsewhere for verification.

[BIGLOOK]

Nothing will be proved unless the authentic document gets into the hands of a forensic team to determine the age of the paper, the fonts of the type and the stamp. You've done yeoman's work with the photo images, Ron, but this needs hands on examination.

Someone earlier on one of these threads mentioned that his daughter clued him to run the images of the 1st on Photo Shop Elements and compare that with others that were published later. The 1st had no layers, the later images had several. I thought that interesting. Any thoughts?

[El Gato]

In my OPINION, the timing of this document is suspect. I hope it’s real. But, it comes out right at the peak of an allout, anti-birther blitzkrieg by the media and the alternate media.

But if it is a forgery, the forger or the ones who had it made, could likely be tracked down, much more easily than finding out who forged the COLB. They had to have some contact, even if through cut-outs, with Orly or "her people". I really hope she has the document itself, and not just an image of something, which would put her, and any document examiner she would employ, one giant leap ahead of anyone on the COLB "problem".