Yeah if the Kenyan doc is fake, and it was based on the Aussie doc, why wouldn’t the maker of the doc change Miller, Lavender and 44b 5733? The maker of the Kenyan doc would have to have been extremely lazy and accepting of risk.
If the Aussie doc is fake, Miller, Lavender and 44b 5733 are the reason for the existence of the document. They would have created the Aussie doc in order to say “look, the Kenyan doc must be bad, because of Miller, Lavender and 44b 5733”
The media / Obama has what they want right now, which is something, anything, to say which would possibly discredit the Kenyan document, especially to those who aren’t paying attention. On Sunday, “47O44” was what they had, and it wasn’t working at all. They’re still trying “Republic”. “E.F. Lavender is a soap” didn’t work. So, they created, or revealed, the Aussie doc.
They don’t want to win the argument, they simply wanted something that wasn’t clearly ridiculous to say, and then they would call the Kenyan doc a fake. They weren’t going to spend 15 minutes on the subject, fairly analyzing each side, they were going to say the “Kenyan doc is fake” and their because became “because it was based on this Aussie doc”. And that was good enough for them. The Kenyan doc may very well be fake, but not because it was based on the Aussie doc.
It is much more likely the Aussie doc is fake than the Kenyan.
Unrelated to this, does South Australia use the book/page format of birth recordkeeping?
I remember someone saying a couple days ago that that book/page system was common in 3rd world countries like Kenya. Is South Australia a 3rd world country?
It was said that no real BC exists in Kenya, only those books, and the Kenyan doc is what you get when you ask for a BC. People have been looking for old South Australian bc’s, and they’re finding them. If there are real South Australian bc’s, it seems to me that they are using a more familiar system similar to the US, and not a book/page system.
Someone from South Australia should be able to answer this.
What I think happened is that is an original Aussie Doc and was changed up to make the Kenya BC look fake.
“Yeah if the Kenyan doc is fake, and it was based on the Aussie doc, why wouldn’t the maker of the doc change Miller, Lavender and 44b 5733? The maker of the Kenyan doc would have to have been extremely lazy and accepting of risk.”
Right. This follows basic principles of text criticism when one tries to figure out which of two varying texts was the model for the other or if they are both modeled on a third source.