Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: RetroSexual; spycatcher
How and why is this document different? I must have missed that. http://file.walagata.com/w/the-salamander/mombasa_copy.jpg
--SpyCatcher

It looks like the same document to me, only one image shows it with a perforated edge and a tear in the upper right, whereas the other does not.
--RetroSexual

Sorry if there is some no-brainer, obvious answer to this, but why wouldn't they both be torn? Where did the torn document come from? For that matter, where did the other one come from?
646 posted on 08/02/2009 5:09:31 AM PDT by ofwaihhbtn (Science is not defined as that which supports atheistic materialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 616 | View Replies ]


To: ofwaihhbtn

if the newer looking one is a copy,wouldn’t it have a dark mark where the tear is upper right?


663 posted on 08/02/2009 5:13:28 AM PDT by wiggen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies ]

To: ofwaihhbtn

Taitz has a photocopy of the one that is torn? Her copy didn’t show the tear?


667 posted on 08/02/2009 5:13:55 AM PDT by ofwaihhbtn (Science is not defined as that which supports atheistic materialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies ]

To: ofwaihhbtn

How and why is this document different? I must have missed that. http://file.walagata.com/w/the-salamander/mombasa_copy.jpg
—SpyCatcher
It looks like the same document to me, only one image shows it with a perforated edge and a tear in the upper right, whereas the other does not.
—RetroSexual

Sorry if there is some no-brainer, obvious answer to this, but why wouldn’t they both be torn? Where did the torn document come from? For that matter, where did the other one come from?

Here’s an explanation: The original copy was in poor shape. It was copied, then both were folded together and put away. That’s why they appear to have similar folds. Also, the fresher copy has the cigarette burn scar, but as a copy of the actual cigarette scar on the older version.


783 posted on 08/02/2009 5:45:48 AM PDT by perchprism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies ]

To: ofwaihhbtn; RetroSexual; spycatcher
Sorry if there is some no-brainer, obvious answer to this, but why wouldn't they both be torn? Where did the torn document come from? For that matter, where did the other one come from

You're assuming that there are two different images of two different documents. Why wouldn't they both be torn? Uh, ever buy a shirt or pants or something and then get it damaged? If you took a picture before it was damaged and another picture after it was damaged and/or soiled, would it rational or irrational to conclude that they were two different articles of clothing because there were differences in their degree of damage? See this post.
807 posted on 08/02/2009 5:53:14 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson