See if you can spot any similarities between this and the lastest "OBAMA BC".
See if you can spot any similarities between this and the lastest "OBAMA BC".
Lots of similarities. And lots of differences. But Taitz has an actual document, not just digital pixels. To posit that her real paper document is a digital forgery based on this Bamford BC is rediculous on its face. The fact that the Bamford BC a) has some of the same identifying numbers, b) has some very similar names of officials, and c) was apparently posted to the web several years ago (although that could be forged) can only mean one of two things: a) It’s purely coincidental, or b) someone has been spending a lot of time and energy forging slight variations of a COLB (at least digitally,) spanning many years and several continents.
Take a look at the absence of any distortion of the letters - either from the form or those typed in where they overly any of the folds.
One thing I did notice is the big difference in the fold locations as well as # of folds.
IMO, if one of them is a fake of the other, that's some pretty impressive photo editing.
As far as I know, editing substantial 3-D folds (that are very irregular linearly and depth)
is far more difficult than...say, 2-D fonts and/or images.
The Book and Page number are the same on both forms. That’s statistically highly improbable. At least one of these documents is fake or has been altered.
Does the fact that this was found by a person who has dogged Polarik and been an Obama stooge make you think twice as to whether the Bomford one is the one that has been forged?
You might also want to take a look at the seal.