To: PhiKapMom
Actually, she was asked through an interpreter and when she said she witnessed his birth, she meant Sr. She was there when Obama SENIOR was born.
4,038 posted on
08/02/2009 6:55:21 PM PDT by
autumnraine
(You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
To: autumnraine
Well duh...wouldn’t she be the one having Obama Sr.?
To: autumnraine
Or is she Obama’s mom’s mom?
To: autumnraine
4,098 posted on
08/02/2009 7:16:40 PM PDT by
PhiKapMom
(Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Coburn/Rubio - Senate 2010 ! Take Back the House/Senate! Stop ZERO!)
To: autumnraine
Excuse me but Obama Sr was her SON so of course she would be there. That makes no sense. I just reread what was written.
4,101 posted on
08/02/2009 7:18:01 PM PDT by
PhiKapMom
(Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Coburn/Rubio - Senate 2010 ! Take Back the House/Senate! Stop ZERO!)
To: autumnraine
"she was asked through an interpreter and when she said she witnessed his birth, she meant Sr"
Wow! You mean that Obama Sr's mom was present for the birth of her own son?
To: autumnraine; PhiKapMom
"
Actually, she was asked through an interpreter and when she said she witnessed his birth, she meant Sr. She was there when Obama SENIOR was born." Was your mother there when you were born?
Would there be any occasion that you could imagine that would cause her to feel a need to state that she was present at your birth?
5,624 posted on
08/03/2009 1:50:45 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson