Taitz, in her filing, makes no representation about the document, other than titling it as “unauthenticated”. She specifies that she has no opinion as to whether it is genuine or not, but that it must be investigated, and that immediately.
My opinion, which I posted on one of these threads earlier this morning, is that it needs to be debunked or validated sooner rather than later.
______________________________________________
Exactly my position. Idle speculation, no matter how imaginative or logical, is not proof.
There is no way to authenticate this photograph because it is not auditable - there is no audit trail from the original document to this photograph. It begs the question, who has posession of the physical document in the photograph? Can an authenticated copy of the official birth cirtificate be produced by the Kenyan authorities? (Maybe the indexing information in the photograph could help them quickly find the document.)
Without the above information, this certainly would not be accepted as evidence in a court of law.