To: balls
“The birth announcement in the Hawaii newspaper does not provide an audit trail whatsoever. “
False. They were derived from the birth records that were submitted to the State of Hawaii. We know based on this that Obama has had birth records submitted to state of Hawaii by August 13, 1961 for his Aug 4, 1961 birth.
2,898 posted on
08/02/2009 2:05:25 PM PDT by
WOSG
(OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
To: WOSG
There’s still the issue with the address used in the birth announcement.
2,941 posted on
08/02/2009 2:12:30 PM PDT by
PowerPro
(2009 - Conservative Revolution Reborn (Go Palin!))
To: WOSG
The birth announcement in the Hawaii newspaper does not provide an audit trail whatsoever.
False. They were derived from the birth records that were submitted to the State of Hawaii. We know based on this that Obama has had birth records submitted to state of Hawaii by August 13, 1961 for his Aug 4, 1961 birth.
And your source for that assertion is what?
2,957 posted on
08/02/2009 2:15:26 PM PDT by
mkjessup
(Excuse me Mr. 0bama? No documentation = No eligibility, ok? Now GTF out of OUR White House, got it?)
To: WOSG
False. They were derived from the birth records that were submitted to the State of Hawaii. We know based on this that Obama has had birth records submitted to state of Hawaii by August 13, 1961 for his Aug 4, 1961 birth. Nah what we know is it is possible birth records were submitted to the state of Hawaii by August 13. We do know it is possible Ann called mama from Kenya told her it was a boy and mama filed the at home birth documents that possibly gave rise to the birth announcements.
2,958 posted on
08/02/2009 2:15:31 PM PDT by
rolling_stone
(no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
To: WOSG
Loosen your obamanoid kneepads. You want to claim they are authentic and ignore the erroneous addredss and absence of the Nordyke tins being listed. Your worshipful sycophancy is getting really over exposed. Go write your next column for publication at WSJ, we don’t need an other obamanoid agitprop right now.
2,970 posted on
08/02/2009 2:17:36 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: WOSG
“False. They were derived from the birth records that were submitted to the State of Hawaii. We know based on this that Obama has had birth records submitted to state of Hawaii by August 13, 1961 for his Aug 4, 1961 birth.”
How do you know they are derived from the birth records submitted to the state? If this is standard procedure, where is it documented?
3,392 posted on
08/02/2009 3:44:59 PM PDT by
balls
("Our government isn't ours any more" - stockpirate)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson