The original for the template used for the “Blaine” forgery may have been withdrawn from the internet because the owner of the BC is still alive and the information could enable identity theft, IIRC. I am not sure, but four years on, that is my recollection.
Just hold this thought, I don't expect an answer:
The COLB first posted gave no indication of the age of the father.
The immigration docs had not been released.
The only evidence of the birth year of the kenyan student that I can remember, is the article published in the Honolulu Star Bulletin in September, 1959, which gave his age as 25. That gives us a birth year of 1934. Just as his early immigration docs show.
BUT as both the 'Blaine document' and the LFBC recently presented, have the AGE OF THE FATHER AS 25 IN 1961, would the obvious question to ask not be...HOW DID THE FORGER OF THE BLAINE DOCUMENT CHOOSE THE AGE PLACED ON THAT DOCUMENT.
SOME LUCKY HIT?
It's just another point to ponder...
Can anyone see what I am getting at? The LFBC shows the father's age as 25. That's a birth year of 1936.
Three weeks after the miracle birth in Hawaii, on the 31st of August, 1961, the 'father' provides a birth year of 1934. And forgets he has children...after crossing out the name of his wife and replacing it with ANN S DUNHAM.
Now why would I be under the impression that the 'parents' weren't communicating very well...