You don’t need someone else to tell you anything, all you need to do is LOOK at the document and decide what the kenyan student wrote in his own hand, and what was added by someone else, who didn’t bother to at least initial the additions.
Do you find this acceptable?
When do you think the additions were made? Silly question. There’s no way of telling, is there?
There’s a foul smell around here trying to make it sound as if I am shouting FORGERY. I am not. I am simply trying to point out what appears to be an anomaly.
The added writing on the form includes the name of the child. The name is shown as Barack Obama 2nd.
The name on the BC is Barack Hussein Obama 11. There’s a difference. Would a proud father after whom the child has been named three weeks ago, make a mistake like that? Just another anomaly...one of thousands.
“You don’t need someone else to tell you anything, all you need to do is LOOK at the document and decide what the kenyan student wrote in his own hand, and what was added by someone else, who didn’t bother to at least initial the additions.”
Senior appears to have regularly submitted forms with lots of blank areas that would need to be filled in by an INS official during either a personal interview or follow-up phone call.
See post #10870, I listed what was in darker ink.
And all I was trying to do first was figure out the 1936 vs 1934 dates on the two forms and get input from folks about the dates.
Then answer your question on where were the differences in handwritng on the two forms .
I hadn’t gotten to the memo yet.
Is there any validity to seizethecarps point about blanks being filled in later as a result of data being filled in by a clerk during a phone call or because of 0 SR coming in to the office and the clerk is filling it out in front of o SR ?