was asked to stipulate to discovery
_________________________________________
“Will you “stipulate to discovery” ???
“No”
“why not”
“Cause I’m the president and it’s good to be president”
Laconic Response from AUSA Roger West
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 12:03 PM From: This sender is DomainKeys verified “Charles Lincoln” View contact details To: “Dr. Orly Taitz” RE: Dr. Taitz seeks stipulation re: Discovery. Mittwoch, den 7. Oktober 2009, 11:31:18 Uhr Von: “West, Roger (USACAC)” Karte anzeigen An: Charles Lincoln
Nuts.
From: Charles Lincoln [mailto:charles.lincoln@rocketmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 11:11 AM To: Dejute, David (USACAC); West, Roger (USACAC) Subject: Dr. Taitz seeks stipulation re: Discovery. Dear Messers DeJute & West:
Dr. Taitz has asked me to ask you whether you are willing to stipulate that, now that the Scheduling Order has been made final, rather than moot, that it is now time for us to begin discovery. We need to start sending out notices of deposition duces tecum to parties and subpoenas duces tecum to non-parties. The Judge specifically said that the Scheduling order would only be important if the case were going to go forward, and he seems to have spoken on this point.
Charles E. Lincoln, Research Associate & Law Clerk for Dr. Taitz, Esq., Attorney for the Plaintiffs.
Deo Vindice
“May the Lord God be with you, and with thy spirit!”
My assistant, Mr. Lincoln has contacted Roger West, assistant US attorney, lead attorney representing the defendants, asking to stipulate to discovery in light of today’s order by Judge Carter. You can see his polite and constructive response “Nuts”. I wonder, if I wasn’t a woman, if I was a part of good old boys club, would there be a more appropriate response.