Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: GregNH; hoosiermama; Tennessee Nana; David; Fred Nerks; All
What's this? Important? More legal maneuvering? WHat the heck is a surreply?

Orly Taitz: Plaintiffs file a surreply in response to Defendants’ Reply filed on Friday

10,470 posted on 09/26/2009 7:55:35 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10467 | View Replies ]


To: afraidfortherepublic
FR thread here, but there's nothing much there yet. Orly Taitz: Plaintiffs file a surreply in response to Defendants’ Reply filed on Friday
10,471 posted on 09/26/2009 7:57:13 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10470 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Sur_Reply -— An additional reply to a motion filed after the motion has already been fully briefed.


10,474 posted on 09/26/2009 3:56:48 PM PDT by Author2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10470 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

She is reaffirming that plaintiffs have standing, the thrust of the MTD by the defendants, based on Lands decision. interesting angle but it seems relevant to me.


10,477 posted on 09/27/2009 3:44:38 PM PDT by GregNH ("Dc Rally from the Ground" by me http://gwgjlm.blogspot.com/2009/09/dc-rally-from-ground.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10470 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson