[GregNH]

09/16/2009 66 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter granting 60 Ex Parte Application for Order for Limited Stay of Discovery. All discovery herein shall be stayed pending resolution of Defendants Motion to Dismiss, except for any discovery as to which Plaintiffs can demonstrate, to the satisfaction of Magistrate Judge Nakazato, is necessary for the purpose of opposing the Motion to Dismiss. (ade) (Entered: 09/17/2009)

Interesting. If I read this correctly the defendants MTD does not contain any reference to any documents, ie BC, college record et al..so does that mean discovery is limited to those documents only mentioned in the MTD, meaning nothing gets discovered?

[rolling_stone]

Interesting. If I read this correctly the defendants MTD does not contain any reference to any documents, ie BC, college record et al..so does that mean discovery is limited to those documents only mentioned in the MTD, meaning nothing gets discovered?

Unless they can demonstrate to the Magistrate the need for it yes no discovery at this time.

[rxsid]

Good find! :)

[Tennessee Nana]

except for any discovery as to which Plaintiffs can demonstrate, to the satisfaction of Magistrate Judge Nakazato, is necessary for the purpose of opposing the Motion to Dismiss
_________________________________________

AHHHHHHH

I believe that would be any and all documents are up for grabs and discovery ???

Especially the long form BC...would be “necessary for the purpose of opposing the Motion to Dismiss”

[Red Steel]

Oh, see you beat me to it. ;-)