[truthfreedom]

Solution to the Bomford / Kenyan issue.

The 44B 5573 refers to a book (44B) and a page in a book (5573)

I think I have that part figured out.

1 is the first book, then 2, up to 999
then
1A is right after 999, then 2A, up to 999A
then
1B is right after 999A, then 2B, up to 999B

Anyway, we have the method to find the answer.

Book / Page does or did work in South Australia

The District Code for HINDMARSH is HIN.

if 44B 5573 is Bomford, then the Kenyan doc is fake.

The following link gives 63 matches for South Australia and
Hin

http://boards.ancestry.com/AdvancedSearch.aspx?p=localities.oceania.australia.sa&cst=category&csn=South+Australia

44B 5573 is not found in ancestry.com, but I assume that it
would be fairly easy for someone in Australia to find it all out.

So, you know, that’s how you find out the answer. No more guessing at fonts.

Either 44B 5573 = Bomfort, and the Kenyan doc is fake or
44B 5573 does not = Bomfort, and the Aussie doc is fake.

So, you know, somebody with some money should get the answer today.

[TBP]

Where it syas Signature of Registrar, why is B. F. Lavender’s name typed, not signed and typed?

[Hiskid]

ping

[LeonardxCross]

The fact that Bernard Barker, Vergilio Gonzales, Eugenio Martínez, Frank Sturgis, and James McCord were apprehended at the Watergate is not what caused the potential impeachment and resignation of Nixon. Nixon was not involved in the burglary, and likely knew nothing about it when it happened. What the main issue was, was the coverup.

If Obama’s handlers put false documents up on the “Fight The Smears” site, and Obama went along with it and contrived to keep details of his eligibility covered up, then there is a problem.

Don’t look for the Democrat House to bring impeachment articles, since they are themselves in it up to their ears. And they have strong biases concerning the matter.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Orly Taitz’s Kenyan birth certificate has inconsistencies with reality. This was pointed out by Keith Olberloon of all people. She should stick to the law and refrain from deception.

[OafOfOffice]

Twitter is down and I have to wonder if this is related. Obama has a powerful hacker for him. Twitter is a big problem for Obama because it allows genuine reports and not the phony msm reporting.

TwitterTwitter is currently experiencing extended downtime: a 30 minute outage that’s one of the longest in recent months. Back in 2007 and 2008, Twitter downtime was relatively frequent: this year the site has been far more stable and its early outages have been largely forgotten.

In the last 5 minutes, Twitter has acknowledged the downtime on its status blog, but adds that it’s unsure of the cause:

Site is down. We are determining the cause and will provide an update shortly.

[john mirse]

The Republican Party should put something like this in its bylaws:

"A Republican Party candidate for Senator, Representative, Vice-President, and President must provide his/her long form birth certificate and his/her college records to Republican Party officials before she/he can be approved to run in a Republican primary.

Such documents will become part of the public record where the public can examine them when it wishes."

1. Remember, the eligibility bylaws of a political party have no legal connection to the Constitution of the United States.

2. That is, each political party is responsible for the eligibility rules and background checks within its own party.

3. In other words, as long as its bylaws of eligibility do not conflict with the eligibility requirements of the U.S. Constitution, the Republican Party---or any political party---can set its own rules as to what documents a Republican candidate must present to Republican Party officials.

4. Putting pressure on the Democratic Party: If the Republican Party puts the rule above into its own bylaws, such an action might put tremendous pressure on the Democratic Party to put a similar eligibility bylaw in its own rules.

[Lisamei62]

Fellow FReeper, Chris Miller, a very talented singer/songwriter AND published author wrote a song called “Where Were You Born” and was kind enough to allow my cowriter, BigDawg and I to do our own rendition...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gCUufJKAKE

Looking forward to meeting those of you who will be at the FReeper Convention in DC in September!!

Hey Barrack....I’ll show ya mine if you show me yours!! ;)

[MrLuigi]

I know no one will probably read this but in case you didn’t notice, the Obama administration is going down in flames after only a half year. He’s making George Bush look like a genius. And all the spontaneous anger over this guy, and his cohorts. Lot of old people too. Obama doesn’t have the foggiest idea how to handle this, he thinks America is one big Chicago. These protests are unbelievable-—I’ve never seen anything like it. And what does he do? He sends in ACORN! LOL! He’s going to try to beat those people up, but it won’t work, it’ll just make them angrier, he’s screwing with everyone’s livelihood and happiness. I’ve never seen such an incompetent as this guy, that includes Bush and Ford and Carter. So, you all wonder why the Republicans will NEVER do anything about Obama’s eligibility problem? They’re just sitting back and letting the Dems do what they always do when they have total power-—completely screw it up. And they’re doing it on such an unprecedented level. The American people are disgusted.
So don’t expect anything to ever come from eligibility concerns, because as long as Dentists and poker players are handling the case, instead of the higher ups needed, it’ll never get off the ground.
Time to remove this bookmark.

[Peter Libra]

Billy Cunningham who has a talk radio show and there is live streaming, deals with the birth certificate issue in masterful fashion about five minutes ago. Bill steers clear of any statement backing the non-eligibility of the President. He has quite a chuckle in offering the alternatives to the President. He mentions Vice President Biden and Speaker Nancy Pelosi as alternatives and is not thrilled.

That being said, he has on our old friend Phillip Berg to talk about the issue in about 15- 20 minutes time. Funny though, I thought Phillip had gone to ground. (chuckle).

[Calamari]

BTT

[Poparhoid]

http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/?p=2910

[shankbear]

Why does this thread continue??? Is it vanity?

[rxsid]

"Birth certificate fraud: It's been done before FBI, Department of Justice have record of bribe scandal

How can an official certification of live birth be obtained if the person on the document wasn't born in the state or even in the country the document was issued?

Actually, it's been done before.

In 2004, following a long investigation by the FBI and Department of State, Jean Anderson, the former deputy registrar of the Hudson County, N.J., Office of Vital Statistics, pleaded guilty to taking money for falsifying county records.

According to a Department of Justice news release, Anderson was paid to insert phony birth records for illegal aliens into the files at her county office. The immigrants, in turn, approached county window clerks and requested copies of their birth certificates, after which the clerks looked to the files and, upon seeing the records Anderson had inserted, issued fraudulent birth certificates unknowingly.

Federal agents executed a search warrant of the HCOVS in February of 2004, resulting in the seizure of hundreds of suspect birth certificates listing birthplaces in Jersey City, N.J, when in fact, the individuals named were immigrants born outside the U.S."

Continued here:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=107200

Not surprising in the least.

[rxsid]

Update on the Keyes v. Obama case and filing of the (alleged) Kenyan B.C. (copy of):

PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARTHUR NAKAZATO’S ACTION OF AUGUST 6, 2009 and MOTION FOR REVIEW PURSUANT TO CDCA L.R. 72-2.1:

NO TRANSFER NOR CONSENT NOR ORDER OF REFERENCE AUTHORIZED THIS MAGISTRATE’S SUA SPONTE ORDER OR INVOLVEMENT IN THIS CASE—MOTION TO RECUSE 28 U.S.C. §455(a)

Judge Arthur Nakazato’s order of August 6, 2009, is a nullity without lawful force or effect because it was entered without any prior transfer nor order of reference, nor by the consent of the parties, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A) and Rule 72(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs are concerned, and first and foremost generally object to Judge Nakazato’s August 6, 2009 order (shown as Document 35) in “Case: 8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN As of: 08/17/2009 06:55 PM PDT” because Judge Nakazato’s hyper-formalistic order appears to be inconsistent with Judge David O. Carter’s oral assurances in court on July 13, 2009, that this case would be allowed to proceed on the merits without undue regard to technicalities.
The motion submitted was extremely important and the technicalities enumerated seem unworthy. The first violations of the local rules which Judge Nakazato listed was the form of the “Notice of Motion” required by Central District of California L.R. 6-1 and L.R. 7-4: Plaintiffs did not check their calendars to select which Monday was their Motion day. While omission was a fair criticism on the Magistrate Judge’s part, L.R. 7-4 states that “the court MAY decline to consider a motion unless it meets to requirements of L.R. 7-4-7-8.” In the context of this case, where none of the Defendants had actually appeared or answered as of yet, and in which Judge Carter had previously set hearings sua sponte without reference to the “Notice of Motion” rule or schedule, Judge Nakazato’s UNAUTHORIZED order striking the Plaintiffs’ Motion seems unduly severe and prejudicial.
In regard to L.R. Rule 11-3.3 regarding form and format: pagination, Plaintiffs submit that their failure to paginate was a printing error, and that in fact they were unaware that their motion had no numbers until this was pointed out by the Court, because on their computer screen, the Motion was fully compliant with: “L.R. 11-3.3 Pagination. All documents shall be numbered consecutively at the bottom of each page.” More perplexing, however, is Judge Nakazato’s reference to Rule 11-3.6: “L.R. 11-3.6 Spacing . The typing or printing on the document shall be double spaced, including citations and quotations.”
Even after carefully examining the three subparts of L.R. 11-3.6 in some detail, Plaintiffs submit that their August 1, 2009, Motion was entirely in compliance with Local Rules 11-3.6, 11-3.6.1, 11-3.6.2, and 11.6.3. In any event, Plaintiffs’ First Amended Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory is currently being prepared. 28 U.S.C. §455(a)

MOTION TO RECUSE MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARTHUR NAKAZATO

As noted above, Judge Arthur Nakazato’s order of August 6, 2009, seems entirely incompatible with Judge David O. Carter’s oral pronouncements made both literally and figuratively ex-cathedra in open court on Monday, July 13, 2009, that he intended to take this case concerning the qualifications of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as President of the United States seriously and see that the merits of this case would not be obscured by trivial technicalities. As the United States Supreme Court has held (per Justice Scalia) that …favorable or unfavorable predisposition can also deserve to be characterized as “bias” or “prejudice” because, even though it springs from the facts adduced or the events occurring at trial, it is so extreme as to display clear inability to render fair judgment. (That explains what some courts have called the “pervasive bias” exception to the “extrajudicial source” doctrine. See, e.g., Davis v. Board of School Comm’rs of Mobile County, 517 F.2d 1044, 1051 (CA5 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 944, 48 L. Ed. 2d 188, 96 S. Ct. 1685 (1976).)

Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. at 551, 114 S.Ct.at 1155, 127 L.Ed.2d at 488 (1994). Plaintiffs submit that Judge Arthur Nakazato’s order, entered without any prior order of reference, without the consent of the parties, and without an order of transfer from the District Judge, shows in its content and tenor a disloyalty to Judge Carter’s promise and in fact a disregard (with regard to the pagination 11-3.6 issues) a complete disregard of the actual compliant nature of the motion attacked. If the Court believes that these Plaintiffs’ counsel has in any way violated Local Rule 11-3.6, the Plaintiffs’ pray that the Court will instruct counsel on the nature of the violations.
The reality is that a firestorm broke loose on the internet and electronic media generally on August 2-5 concerning the document attached to Plaintiff’s August 1, 2009 Document 34 as Exhibit A. Plaintiffs’ counsel was subjected to verbal abuse including death-threats and that this firestorm was unjustifiably fed and fanned by Judge Arthur Nakazato’s order. The reality of this case is that respect for the importance of the issues involved, such as the respect shown by Judge David O. Carter on July 13, 2009, is the only hope for a fair and just resolution in the best interests of the people of the United States.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray that the United States District Court will sustain their objections to Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato’s order entered Thursday August 6, 2009, which objections are submitted within ten business days as allowed by Rule 6(a)(2), and that the Court will set together the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Review of Judge Nakazato’s order together with the Plaintiff’s Motion to Recuse Judge Arthur Nakazato for hearing prior to the 24 days after service required by local Rule 6-1 and 7-4 which yields an “ordinary” Motion day of September 14, 2009. Respectfully submitted,

Monday, August 18, 2009

By:________________________________

Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (SBN 223433)

Attorney for the Plaintiffs

26302 La Paz, Suite 211

Mission Viejo, California 92691

Telephone (949) 683-5411

E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com

"http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=3906"

[rxsid]

"Discovery hearing re. Obama’s Kenyan BC, request for depositions of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates scheduled for September 8th, 8am.
I am asking supporters to be there."

"MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: ORDER SETTING SEPTEMBER 8, 2009 HEARING ONMOTIONS: (See document for details.)
In summary, the Court sets for hearing at 8:00 a.m. on September 8, 2009, (1) the Discovery Motion, (2) the Service Notice, and (3) the Ex Parte Application. All parties are ordered to be present. The Clerk shall serve this minute order on all parties to the action. (rla) (Entered: 08/21/2009)"

"http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=3946"

[rxsid]

[1] Barack Hussein Obama II

[2] DOB: 4th day of August, 1961

[3] Parents: Stanley Ann Obama Barack Hussein Obama

[4] Mother’s Maiden Name: Dunham

[5] Weight & Footprint: 7 Pounds, 1 Ounce

[6] Certificate Number: 32018

[7] Attending Physician’s Name: James O.W. Ang’Awa

[8] Physician’s Signature

[9] Registrar’s Name and Signature: John Kwame Odongo

Photo 10 seal.jpg [10] Hospital Seal: Coast Province General Hospital Mombassa, Kenya

[11] Receipt stamp from Hospital: looks like Feb. 1, 2009

http://americangrandjury.org/ebay-seller-is-back-with-a-youtube-video-of-obamas-kenyan-birth-certificate

[rxsid]

Perhaps some good "news" (pun intended) here regarding Dr. Taitz's upcoming court hearing Keyes v Obama & potential for the court to verify the alleged (copy of) Kenyan B.C.:

Fox news stated that they will be in the courtroom on Sept. 8

Mary Anne McKiernan talked to one of the producers from Fox news, he identified himself as Pier, he stated that they feel that Sept 8 hearing is important and newsworthy and they will be in the courtroom

"http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=4027"

[OKSooner]

Bttt

[rxsid]

FYI - New eligibility case, aparently similar to Maj. Cook's

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2327189/posts