Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/17/2009 1:52:29 PM PST by JoeProBono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: JoeProBono

thats 21 mega pix resolution?


2 posted on 01/17/2009 1:54:16 PM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new mexico

Stop boiling your weed in old coffee cans.


3 posted on 01/17/2009 1:55:49 PM PST by Cyber Ninja (His legacy is a stain OnTheDress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono

Means nothing; another group of grany photos!


5 posted on 01/17/2009 1:56:42 PM PST by Colonel Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono

We’ins in Cecil County, Maryland have been having the same sightin’s according to the local rag. No pictures though.

http://www.cecilwhig.com/articles/2009/01/13/news/doc496c0551a3bb8610129989.txt


6 posted on 01/17/2009 1:58:16 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (Sexual Chocolate Almond Chip with extra Hot Fudge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono

I think 21 mp should have been 2.1 mp. No way those shots came from a 21 mp camera.


7 posted on 01/17/2009 1:58:57 PM PST by DevNet (What's past is prologue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono

Bird. Now its an IFO.


8 posted on 01/17/2009 1:59:05 PM PST by SampleMan (Community Organizer: What liberals do when they run out of college, before they run out of Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono

New government toy under test?


9 posted on 01/17/2009 2:00:51 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (The committed will surely dominate the complacent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono
Ihave a much better picture - Photobucket
15 posted on 01/17/2009 2:09:00 PM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono
No big deal. Zooms can capture birds that your eye doesn't see.

 

 

19 posted on 01/17/2009 2:15:57 PM PST by JoJo Gunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono

Looks like birds. Sheesh.


21 posted on 01/17/2009 2:20:05 PM PST by LiberConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono

Didn’t one of those things take down a plane a day or two ago, in New York?


24 posted on 01/17/2009 2:30:47 PM PST by DYngbld (Aspire to inspire before you expire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono
There have been millions of digital cameras sold over the years where all you have to do is point and push a button and perfect picture. Not one clear picture of a UFO. Amazing.
25 posted on 01/17/2009 2:39:07 PM PST by kempo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono

That “craft” looks more like a turkey buzzard.


29 posted on 01/17/2009 3:08:40 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quix

Where’s Quix? Happy Saturday night to you!


35 posted on 01/17/2009 3:43:12 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono

BTW, Chama is really not that far from . . . rum roll . . .

DULCE

and

Los Alamos.


39 posted on 01/17/2009 3:56:33 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono

Some interesting links from one of the recent ATS threads I’ve linked to on such:

http://www.robocat.users.btopenworld.com

...

http://www.geoffreylandis.com

...

http://www.conjecturenews.com

...

http://www.ufoconspiracy.com
...

http://www.boblazar.com
...
Sojuzkarta KFA-1000 Camera

http:/www.au.youtube.com


42 posted on 01/17/2009 4:01:53 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono; doug from upland; Las Vegas Dave; SunkenCiv

Doug F Up . . . about 2-3 or so pages down is a link to a YOUTUBE about antigravity physics you might be interested in.

The following also from this thread:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread421144/pg3

Source of below:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T.T._Brown

Early and middle years
Brown was born in Zanesville, Ohio; his parents were Lewis K. and Mary Townsend Brown. In 1921, Brown discovered what was later called the Biefeld-Brown effect while experimenting with a Coolidge X-ray tube. This is a vacuum tube with two asymmetrical electrodes. Brown noticed that there was a force exerted by the tube when it was connected to a high-voltage source. This force was not caused by the X-rays, but by this new effect. Later, in 1923, he collaborated with Paul Alfred Biefeld at Denison University, Granville, Ohio. He started a military career afterwards and was involved in a number of science programs.
In 1930 he joined the U.S. Navy and conducted fundamental research in electromagnetism, radiation, field physics, spectroscopy, gravity and other topics. He later worked for Glenn L. Martin and, still later, for the National Defense Research Committee (NDRC) and the Office of Scientific Research and Development, headed at that time by Dr. Vannevar Bush. After 1944 he worked as a consultant to the Lockheed-Vega Aircraft Corporation.

Later years
In 1955, Brown went to England, and then France where he worked for La Société Nationale de Construction Aéronautique du Sud Ouest (SNCASO). In 1956, the aviation trade publication Interavia reported that Brown had made substantial progress in anti-gravity or electro-gravitic propulsion research. Top U.S. aerospace companies had also become involved in such research (see United States gravity control propulsion research (1955 - 1974)) which may have become a classified subject by 1957. Others contend Brown’s research simply reached a dead end and lost support. Though the effect he discovered has been proven to exist by many others, Brown’s work was controversial because others and even he himself believed that this effect could explain the existence and operation of unidentified flying objects (UFOs).

Brown was an early investigator of UFOs and in 1956 helped found the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP). Though Townsend resigned not long after NICAP was founded, NICAP was an influential force in civilian UFO research through 1970. The organization’s activities drew the attention of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), several high-level officers of which joined the group. Brown’s research has since become something of a popular pursuit around the world, with amateur experimenters replicating his early experiments in the form of “lifters” powered by high-voltage.


an interesting YOUTUBE on nano-stuff:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLvjZ_TTrDM


YouTube explaining antigravity physics:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xnh5Nd4DzM


And another here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBhsz3iXgGk


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrogravitics

Electrogravitics is a research subject based upon the original work of Nikola Tesla, and hypotheses advanced by Thomas Townsend Brown and Brown’s subsequent extensive experimentation and demonstrations of the effect. The term was in widespread use by 1956.[1] The effects of electrogravity have been searched for extensively in countless experiments since the beginning of the 20th century; to date, other than Brown’s experiments and the more recent ones reported by R. L. Talley[2], Eugene Podkletnov, and Giovanni Modanese, no conclusive evidence of electrogravitic signatures has been found. Recently, some investigation has begun in electrohydrodynamics (EHD) or sometimes electro-fluid-dynamics, a counterpart to the well-known magneto-hydrodynamics, but these do not seem a priori to be related to Brown’s “electrogravitics” .


UNITED STATES GRAVITY CONTROL PROPULSION RESEARCH 1955-1974

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_gravity_control_propulsion_initiative

American interest in “gravity control propulsion research” intensified during the early 1950s. Literature from that period used the terms anti-gravity, anti-gravitation, baricentric, counterbary, electrogravitics, G-projects, gravitics, gravity control, and gravity propulsion.[1][2] Their publicized goals were to develop and discover technologies and theories for the manipulation of gravity or gravity-like fields for propulsion.[3] Although general relativity theory appeared to prohibit anti-gravity propulsion, several programs were funded to develop it through gravitation research from 1955 to 1974. The names of many contributors to general relativity and those of the golden age of general relativity have appeared among documents about the institutions that had served as the theoretical research components of those programs.[4][5][6] The existence and 1950s emergence of the gravity control propulsion research had not been a subject of controversy for aerospace writers, critics, and conspiracy theory advocates. But its rationale, effectiveness, and longevity have been the objects of contested views.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrofluid

A ferrofluid (from the Latin ferrum, meaning iron) is a liquid which becomes strongly polarised in the presence of a magnetic field.

Ferrofluids are colloidal mixtures composed of nanoscale ferromagnetic, or ferrimagnetic, particles suspended in a carrier fluid, usually an organic solvent or water. The ferromagnetic nano-particles are coated with a surfactant to prevent their agglomeration (due to van der Waals and magnetic forces). Although the name may suggest otherwise, ferrofluids do not display ferromagnetism, since they do not retain magnetization in the absence of an externally applied field. In fact, ferrofluids display (bulk-scale) paramagnetism, and are often described as “superparamagnetic” due to their large magnetic susceptibility. Permanently magnetized fluids are difficult to create at present.[1]

The difference between ferrofluids and magnetorheological fluids (MR fluids) is the size of the particles. The particles in a ferrofluid primarily consist of nanoparticles which are suspended by Brownian motion and generally will not settle under normal conditions. MR fluid particles primarily consist of micrometre-scale particles which are too heavy for Brownian motion to keep them suspended, and thus will settle over time due to the inherent density difference between the particle and its carrier fluid. These two fluids have very different applications as a result.


FOR the moment . . . dat’s it.


48 posted on 01/17/2009 4:27:32 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono
V-shaped UFOs in NM photos........

We learned nothing last Thursday.

< IMG SRC=" I can't find the image " >

84 posted on 01/17/2009 5:38:09 PM PST by Daffynition ("Beauty is in the sty of the beholder." ~ Joe 6-pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono

*


105 posted on 01/17/2009 8:57:23 PM PST by Sam Cree (absolute reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono
so 1980s


208 posted on 01/20/2009 8:36:50 AM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson