Posted on 01/17/2009 1:52:28 PM PST by JoeProBono
CHAMA, NM - Several meandering V-shaped UFOs near a mountain slope here turned up on a woman's digital photos. Three photos shot with a 21 megapixel camera caught multiple crafts approaching in the first frame, one craft in frame two moving close to the ground while the others take positions in the sky, and then frame three shows all of the crafts moving out of the area.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
“I’ve served in the military, and was trained in the care and feeding of classified material. Were you?”
Yes, for 30 years with Top Secret TK/SI. Only counter intelligence investigators ever use planted false or real classified information to try and catch a leaker or mole. It is highly risky, managed extremely carefully, and very rare. It is only done when a one or a few people are suspected and they want to narrow down the candidates. It is NEVER done in the absence of an investigation. The idea of creating a series of documents with misspellings in order to flush out non-existent leakers is patently absurd since it would be so complex and hard to manage it would never lead anywhere. Furthermore, this technique would quickly become known to everyone handling the documents that it would become useless. There are far easier ways to protect classified information, including the need to know, and signed bigot lists.
Speculations abound regard US-built craft that are, well, UFOs. Even Admiral Inman stated on a TV interview that the US has some exceedingly exotic craft that have yet to become public.
Those exotic craft probably account for a portion of the UFO sightings. We still fly the space shuttle because there are "dark projects" and public projects. The compartmentalization is absolute, and many in government are just like you in their beliefs. There are others who know more, either because they have blabby buddies or have worked in proximity to the dark projects.
Dr. Edward Mitchell, an astronaut who walked on the moon, states clearly and confidently that the US has ongong ET contacts and that much of our advanced technologies stem from ET sources.
Go to rense.com, and look at the articles about the giant machines in earth orbit. They were discovered by a gentleman who was trying to photograph the ISS from his home.
Such tender-hearted thoughtfulness!
However, Dear Heart,
you might consider being more cautious before engaging in such kindness. Wouldn’t want your carefully crafted image to slip too much. The gentler, kinder, more reasonable one probably wouldn’t make as much money at naysaying.
Of course there are, the "Eyes Only" reading room being the best of them.
Still, you miss the point that most documents are not proofed and corrected. Officers and gentlemen do not hover over spelling and grammar mistakes when the important matter is the information being disseminated.
Given your background, I'd hazard a guess that you are here for counterintelligence purposes. ;-D
Honestly, back in the days of the manual typewriter, document beauty, spelling, and grammar issues were just not important unless the document was to published at a printing facility for general distribution or sent to a Conressman or the President. (Like Field Manuals, Training Circulars, and other formal material.) If you actually served in the indicated capacity for that long, you would have to admit that this was true. Furthermore, I am an engineer and work with engineers. We can't spell or compose a sentence that reflects favorably upon our level of education. The fellows who prepared those reports were not literary giants. In order to limit exposure of the material, additional personnel such as proofreaders and typists would not be added to the project. Could you dispute that?
SPOKEN LIKE A TRUE DYED-IN-THE-WOOL LIBERAL.
. . . amazing . . .
And seemingly without embarrassment! Shocking.
1. Liberals and yazoo seem to drink exclusively from the trough that asserts that hard cold “facts” gathered exclusively from tangible “proven” “scientific” “experimental” efforts and results are the only things to be considered “true” though there isn’t any such thing as truth.
2. Liberals and yazoo seem to demand that some sort of pristine, perfect, paragonly lofty bar of proof has to be met before they can admit anything past their willfully blind mentality on a list of issues and topics.
3. Therefore, Liberals and yazoo seem to be utterly unthinkingly addicted to sucking at the tit of a TYPE II ERROR erroneously imagining that a TYPE II ERROR poison is less deadly than a TYPE I ERROR.
4. Liberals and yazoo work very hard to pick any item of “proof” which a given discipline is unlikely to produce in a given situation or context in order to avoid jangling their narrow, rigid, irrational sensibilities.
5. Liberals and yazoo are never in danger of observing consciously that their position has been proven utterly lacking and false by a hundred or a thousand or even 10,000 solid, responsible, sane, experienced, trained, objective witnesses. Witnesses just don’t count in their world, at all. Witnesses don’t count at 911. Witnesses don’t count in terms of terrorists, their training and/or deeds. Witnesses don’t count about UFO’s. Witnesses are just automatically and arbitrarily, insanely “off the table” for liberals and yazoo.
6. Liberals and yazoo spend unreasonable amounts of time and mental energy rationalizing away facts which thousands of extremely qualified experts AS WELL AS the general public (80% + in terms of UFO’s) accepted as facts decades ago.
Ah well. It should make for a few of rich dentists in the future as so many naysaying jaws drop and shatter on the sidewalk.
QUOTES OF OUR LEADERS available here:
HERE: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81
Have you ever even
KNOWN
ANYONE
in military intelligence and counter-intelligence?
Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, dogs and cats . . . you might want to don hazmat suits . . . a very horrific variety of
IGNORANCE ON PARADE
is loose and bounding merrily about.
Have you always been that clueless about the MAIN STREAM MEDIA?
ANOTHER SIMILARITY LADIES AND GENTLEMEN . . . liberals and yazoo BELIEVE the Main Stream Media! LOL.
Time magazine has been in the slavish employ of the Ruling Oligarchy from it’s creation.
LOL.
What a farce of a postulation! LOL.
ROTFLOL.
CUE dog slapping floor.
BTW, as I understood it . . .
the clean-up crews do not use beaming technology but merely one of our own UFO craft.
GOODNESS!
Maybe I should sit down.
Maybe I read your post wrong.
Are you actually learning something?
I don’t think I’m prepared for naysayers to learn something. Too great a shock to my system.
Oh, Dear me!
There you go again . . .
expecting a naysayer to respect or learn something from facts.
If he was in the military at all . . .
he never got close to classified material
or
his memory and understanding have 100% leaked out about all such facts and realities, obviously.
The shuttle disasters and deaths were all at the service of a vast and expensive
SMOKE SCREEN.
I’m increasingly convinced that the folks who assert that we’ve been on the moon and Mars for decades are accurate.
Obviously, you don’t even believe the Apollo astronauts.
Ain’t ignorance wonderful! LOL.
BTW, some of our advanced planes reportedly have dual propulsion systems—antigravity and conventional.
That’s a relief. I was increasingly convinced you knew absolutely nothing about the secret world.
Glad someone like you is around who knows something of the score.
besides the 150 plus members of the UFO ping list, that is.
What a relief.
There you go again . . .
expecting naysayers to learn from facts! LOL.
I’d say he has to know that if he’s as purported . . .
unless he’s just tooooooooooooo OBSESSIVE/COMPULSIVE AND PRISSY to admit such facts and realities.
I didn’t realize reading comprehension was
THAT
much of a problem.
The government chose the shuttles as an expensive smoke-screen.
The shuttles are archaic technology flying more or less on a fairly improbable to impossible wing and a prayer as quite a number of NASA and contracting engineers have asserted.
The disasters did not need to be orchestrated even by the oligarchy for them to be responsible because they chose to use such a complex bag of bolts as a smoke-screen.
. . . unnecessarily putting precious patriots’ lives at stake.
Please let me know if this is not simiplified or elaborated enough. I’m willing to TRY again.
Why?
Who knows.
We don’t know everything about them.
However, the lights often demonstrate some very very strange capabilities for “lights.”
Maybe it’s partly a demonstration in such capacities to awe the natives.
1. Lights are seen extending down from ships but the light shaft visibly halting XX feet above the ground.
2. Lights are seen ‘lifting objects’ into the craft.
3. Lights are seen which have visual and even emotional qualities about them which no other lights are known to have.
4. Lights have been seen to function more or less as conveyor belts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.