Well, try it for yourself. It's not that bad. 
Posted on 01/17/2009 1:52:28 PM PST by JoeProBono
CHAMA, NM - Several meandering V-shaped UFOs near a mountain slope here turned up on a woman's digital photos. Three photos shot with a 21 megapixel camera caught multiple crafts approaching in the first frame, one craft in frame two moving close to the ground while the others take positions in the sky, and then frame three shows all of the crafts moving out of the area.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
My camera has a 10x zoom ,and it’s not easy to keep the camera rigid. 700x optical zoom, not digital zoom, would be impossible, seems to me probably so even on a tripod.
Well, try it for yourself. It's not that bad.
Great reply.
LOL.
ROTFLOL.
Do you understand my point? The quality of any picture is related to the size of the object on the imaging medium and the amount of atmosphere between the object and the camera. UFO pictures are not so clear because the conditions under which the photographs ae made are not optimal for spectacular clarity.
Nit picking over exaggerated examples skirt the issue.
Wow, I didn't notice that! That would be a feat without a serious mount and traversing mechanism.
Nit picking over exaggerated examples skirt the issue.
= = =
QUITE SO.
However, to be overly fair . . . when naysayers are typically nits from the Land of Nit . . . nit picking kind of comes naturally.
Besides, it’s almost the only currency they have.
That’s what I suspected and tried to articulate upthread. But I’m not experienced enough with such to have known how to put it well.
Thanks.
But they’ve always been reported high and low, near and far, day and night.
As for their being aliens, again I ask: how do you know? What can you base that on?
By the way, that’s a really hard hitting “journalistic” site you’ve linked to.
There was a noob that went by “indianbob” who seemed to post threads almost exclusively from there. I see he’s been canned.
No doubt many, probably most, would be too stunned to reach for their camera immediately, maybe even me. But let’s say that I finally got an image of one.
What would it take for me to get it on the Freep, (or at least link to such a file, the camera of which what I have now averages around 4 to 6 megs, depending on detail)? In this age of high speed internet, it would be almost impossible to stop an image from being copied and passed around.
(The acceptance or ridicule would come later, naturally).
I honestly believe that if you lost the ability to post images that you’d jump off of a building.
Keep in mind that all we have to go on, without access to the originals, are resized and/or cropped, and who knows with what filter and what quality?
There are numerous "disclosures" that have occured in the past. Dr. Edgar Mitchell is but one of many. There have been four death bed accounts of the Roswell crash by key players in that incident.
After reading UFO lore for over twenty years, a pattern emerges that tends to "separate the wheat from the chaff".
Numerous foreign governments have already released files, and their explanations include ETs in some cases.
If you will examine all of that material extensively, you would see that most of the evidence tends to support ET contact. I have not arrived at this conclusion without a lot of reading and contemplation.
“The quality of any picture is related to the size of the object on the imaging medium and the amount of atmosphere between the object and the camera.”
Do you get my point? UFOs follow a specific pattern of always being far away in order to explain the bad quality of the photograph. When people claim to have seen a giant UFO hovering directly overhead they never seem to have a camera of any sort with them, not even a cellphone. Should make anyone skeptical.
“that you NEVER
accept anyone’s first hand report of THEIR experience
and 100% of the time in all areas absolutely insist
ON LEARNING THINGS FIRST HAND THE HARD WAY?”
Actually, if someone tells me they saw a car accident on the way to my house, I believe them. I know car accidents happen because I’ve seen a few myself, have seen lots of pictures, and have body repair shops in abundance as evidence.
If someone tells me they were visited during the night by bigfoot I’m going to figure A. they are making it up. B. they are delusional. C. I am talking to you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.