Posted on 01/17/2009 1:52:28 PM PST by JoeProBono
CHAMA, NM - Several meandering V-shaped UFOs near a mountain slope here turned up on a woman's digital photos. Three photos shot with a 21 megapixel camera caught multiple crafts approaching in the first frame, one craft in frame two moving close to the ground while the others take positions in the sky, and then frame three shows all of the crafts moving out of the area.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
I can’t honestly recall any critical thinking being the least bit evident in any of your UFO posts.
I just don’t think you’d NORMALLY let ANYTHING cloud your thinking down 30-50 IQ points.
Mystifying—IF—you’re not a paid government shill. Something does.
THE SUBJECT OF THE THREAD IS V SHAPED UFO’S.
You are certainly bright enough to know that.
Or are you trying to be prissy somehow about the original post.
Prissiness is not one of my cherished interests.
GOOD NIGHT.
EDUCATIONAL dreams to you, Dear Heart.
Now, Star Traveler . . .
you should know
naysayers have to ignore MD’s, Airline pilots, military officers etc. unless they can find some chink or angle to derisively dismiss them over.
Well, it’s like I’ve said before, I really don’t keep up with this stuff, but you can’t simply dismiss that many people of all different kinds of occupations and levels of experience and say they are seeing things as part of mass hysteria and/or are mixing it up with flares or balloons.
So, this one particular event appears to be fairly significant.
I know that there exists thousands of reports, in general, about UFOs, but this one should be all that someone needs to see to know that “something” is out there — but I sure don’t know what it is... :-)
I do remember hearing about it way back then (but only after it hit the national media, though). The odd thing was that it was not picked up by the national media until a significant amount of time later. I don’t know why that was the case...
I was held captive for 3 days by the creatures in this UFO ...they wanted me for sexual experiments and forced me to make love to Catherine Zeta-Jones
PHX LIGHTS VIDEOS:
http://ufo.whipnet.org/digital.proof/phoenix.video.2005/index.3.html
Not spectacular but give some clue to the size of the thing.
another video . . . haven’t tested this link yet:
this link seems to work:
http://ufo-media.com/official-evidence/mass-sightings/ufo-phoenix-lights-full-version-1997.html
might be an Interesting video if it will ever finish loading.
I understand.
thanks thanks.
You said — “I was held captive for 3 days by the creatures in this UFO ...they wanted me for sexual experiments and forced me to make love to Catherine Zeta-Jones.
Ummm..., you just thought it was Catherine Zeta-Jones. “They” do mind projections on you... You don’t want to know who it really was... LOL...
Thanks for the extra links and information. I’ll look through them, but probably tomorrow... :-)
Heading to bed shortly, myself.
Pinging the ufo list.
The horror of it all, LoL!
Where was that pearl white opalescent sphere observed being loaded into an ambulance? I forget.
Heading to church for an altar workers’ class shortly.
Y’all have fun.
“Well, let me ask you this... how many photos came out of the Phoenix sightings a few years back? (I think it was Phoenix...).
If thats the right place, it created such a furor over the sightings, that the city had a press conference about it, as I recall. How many pictures resulted from that one?”
What I find fascinating about believers in Flying saucers is the way the argument is always framed. It’s a lot like people who believe in the conspiracy to kill John Kennedy. It’s never done by providing proof of their argument, it’s always about posing questions that are impossible to answer. And, since their questions can’t be answered, it must be proof of their theory. People who believe these UFOs are from outer space are obligated to provide proof these are extra terrestrials. Those of us who don’t believe, are under no obligation to provide any explanation other than “we don’t know what it is, and neither does anyone else.”
“Remember that when the shuttle Columbia went down that there were a small handful of screencaps of weather radars showing the shuttle’s ionized trail?”
Or the fact that we have two (so far) video clips of the plane going down in the Hudson last week. Security cameras are typically not high end quality, yet we can clearly identify the plane and it’s water landing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVWKRUCM9s8&feature=PlayList&p=CE173C2FD7D22E3A&index=0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvNiBfkuWEo&feature=PlayList&p=CE173C2FD7D22E3A&playnext=1&index=1
With the exception of nearly moving my bowels at that moment, no.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.