Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: ichabod1
Hmm... what might have happened to make the Brits think that might be a good idea, eh? Or at least justified?

True enough. The Germans bombed civilians first and the British responded. On the other hand, Germany's continued concentration on civilian targets gave Britain's industry time to recover, and this was crucial to Britain's successfully resisting the German onslaught.
137 posted on 11/13/2007 7:37:24 PM PST by JamesP81 ("I am against "zero tolerance" policies. It is a crutch for idiots." --FReeper Tenacious 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: JamesP81

And the Brits conducted the so-called carpet bombing because, contrary to popular legend, the Norton Bombsight couldn’t put a bomb in a pickle barrel at 20,000 feet. At least it couldn’t at night, and they conducted their raids at night to protect the crews.

I get sick and tired of people attacking the allies tactics at this late date when we didn’t ask for that damn war, we didn’t start it, we just finished it.

Take the atomic bombings. Those bombs saved four million Japanese lives. People always point to the million of ours it saved from being lost in an invasion. I would submit we would have had to kill 4X the number of japs to get the job done so it was for their benefit too.

War is like in infected tooth. There’s no easier softer way, you just have to get in there and yank it.


151 posted on 11/14/2007 6:55:33 AM PST by ichabod1 ("Self defense is not only our right, it is our duty." President Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson