Posted on 05/26/2007 1:49:34 PM PDT by Eurotwit
Traffic Rank per Alexa.com:
Free Republic: 5,449
Lucianne.com: 46,978
Sweetness-light.com: 265,776
NYObserver.com: 348,579
DarwinCentral.org: 4,013,112
WideAwakes.net: 4,432,408
ClownPosse.org (Defunct)
I'm surprised you didn't know about the NYO
It's a lot more well known than some of your other BFF's sites.
Oh, and BTW I never saw a retraction of your lie posted here on FR about me.
Conservative men are more likely to be chivalrous without ostentatiousness.
Conservative women are more likely to be grateful for opened doors and just generally being treated like a Lady.
That old traditional family values thing, I suppose....
Works for me.
thanks....it was a long walk..lol
It’s kind of fun to watch the WA skirmishes,
seething under a thin veil of ‘civility’.
Same posters who left here in a huff,
still huffin & a puffin.
Shangrila NOT.
http://www.house.gov/hunter/index.shtml
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1773726/posts?page=101,50
You may want to recheck Duncan Hunter’s sites.
Brownbeck also voted against the surge and is for amnesty.
Huckabee is no better and Tancredo only wishes he had the record Hunter has on the border issues
Good point! I think the implications go without saying.
Um, I’m for the surge, against amnesty, and believe in evolution. I was praising Hunter.
- It’s truly sad. As I said in my original posting - you really have no candidate to represent your views in 2008. You are out of the mainstream. Better you stay home in 2008 and rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Got that.
Ranks right up there with those ‘brave freedom fighters’ who cover up their faces with ski masks.
Bravery is not shown by hiding your face. Just a little comment to those COWARDS who hide their names, making them pathetic cowards like the sky mask gangs.
Pathetic cowards every one of them.
Why don't you just try to respond to my post, gabby?
You overestimate him. He’s just another aging rich guy with a big head. And thanks to his past currency-manipulating antics, he’s got a lot of enemies in high places — more than any other aging rich guy with a big head that I can think of. If he has any succession plan at all, it will splinter quickly into lots of in-fighting factions.
You are out of the mainstream.
I probably am -- which I consider a point in my favor (see quote below). But anyone who supports Rudy Giuliani is going to be seriously disappointed when they find out how far out of the mainstream that limp-wristed, effete, lisping liberal is in this country.
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot." -- Mark Twain
Now this is just too prescious! You are claiming to be a victim and asking others to be civil? You came on this thread and questioned my integrity, refusing to respond after multiple requests. You continued to insult others with your broad-brush slurs. You have continually whined about those who were banned for breaking the rules and refuse to respond to the matters which got them banned. And now you act as if you are a victim? Puhleeeeeeeeeeze!
Now, why don't you quit acting like a liberal troll and answer just some of the questions posed to you on this thread. Here are some:
Post #596: Againwhat did I post that is not honest? Be specific and provide a link.Post #658: Please define "kooky fringe" and identify to whom you refer.
Post #662: Do you support her posting lies about Reagan to prop up Rudy?
there are still some of them left. They’re at this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1840839/posts
Seems to me she was the result of a campaign promise to appoint a female to the court. Another example of political expediency like the signing of the Therapeutic Abortion Bill. Even the best get sucked into that stuff.
Reagan also promised that his next nominee after Bork would upset Bork's critics and share his views. All we got out of that was Kennedy. Who, incidently, was the subject of impeachment talk by conservatives such as Phyllis Schafly, Michael Farris and Edwin Vieria in 2005.
Ooooooo; a nasty Freepmail. Boo-hoo! Did you wet yourself when you read it?
RA contributed more to the collective intelligence of this website in one week than you have in your entire existence as a member of FR.
Face it, you couldn't carry RadioAstronomer's sliderule if it was stapled to your hand.
FreeRepublic's loss is DarwinCentral.org's gain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.