Posted on 02/02/2007 4:47:11 PM PST by PhiKapMom
Note the personal attack against you @ post 65. Feel free to take whatever action you deem appropriate.
GA is for Newt. Newt has gravitaz.
"LOL. Logic is clearly not your strong suit, is it? Gun-grabbing, cross-dressing babykillers are not mainstream GOP. Got it?"
See Posts 50 and 113.
"What military experience does your crossdressing candidate have?"
If that was the criterion of a good candidate, we would have supported Kerry, or even Weasley Clark over Bush in 2004. That criterion suggests we should support McCain today.
Reductio ad absurdum.
Well, if they are this careless now, what will they be like if they ever get into office? Scary stuff.
It's a sad sad day on FR when I have to scroll past a dozen preemptive jokes about what others are going to say to find some real debate (I gave up and just hit reply; I don't think it's possible on these threads anymore).
We all know who you're all talking about. You say the same things over and over to the same people over and over, often accusing them of saying the same things over and over. That said, I'm pretty sure that's a no-no around civilized parts such as these: personal attacks and Zinging-not-Pinging.
I know we're all older than 4 (my daughter's age), and even she isn't this goofy when she thinks I'm wrong!
LOL. That's funny.
No military experience. Corrupt associates (Kerik, for example), cronyism run amock, liberalism run amock. Bad on core conservative values. Sorry, your support makes the word sad appropos.
Type in Duncan Hunter and Defense Contracts. San Diego paper and USA have articles about it.
Was sent an email and reminded of the fact that Tinker AFB lost money to a contractor that Cunningham and Hunter wanted to get for a system the DoD didn't want. So I went searching on line and took less than 10 minutes to find most the details. I thought I had remembered what happened but I wanted to refresh my memory.
We already HAVE a one party system. Do you really think GWB is a conservative??
Only 1 in 5 Republicans know that Giuliani is pro-abortion and pro-civil unions for homosexuals Let's see what those favorability ratings look like when that number is 4 in 5.
None. But he is real good against homeless bums,porno shops, high profile mob figures and the squeege guys. At least when he isn't in court fighting ( using tax dollars)to keep his city a sanctuary for illegals and filing lawsuits against gun manufacturers. Real tough!
"No, Rudy has said point blank, not grudglingly, that he is against gay marriage and that it is a state issue. And it is a state issue. The POTUS and no power over marriage at all!!! Which means the POTUS has the same amount of power over the issue as your local dog catcher. Think about it."
The concept of Federalism goes over the heads of Rudy haters. Believe me, you can explain it to them until you're blue in the face and they refuse to give an inch.
Can't we find another candidate who is much more conservative, and just as likely to do a great, tough job in the WoT?
For instance, Duncan Hunter is very conservative and not only has military experience, but also has a son over there as we speak. Who could possibly understand, or have more of a vested interest in our success/victory over there than Hunter?
Certainly not rudy, who doesn't cut it on the three positives that Hunter has, and were mentioned above.
A fiscal, domestic, and foreign policy conservative that supports strict constructionist judges is bad?
Great. Thanks, but no thanks.
*adjusting my Marilyn Monroe wig* He took on the mob...and won. He took on Wall St...and won. He took on crime in NYC...and won.
Terrorists better run and go to ground. Rudy will dig em up and put em on trial.
Dubya has done a fine job...Rudy will prosecute this war the way it should have been!!!
I don't view this as a negative. And I don't view it as a scandal. He's been aggressively pro high tech weapons. Hes' from San Diego. He represents active duty military (lots in his area), retired military and some local military contractors. Saying the Pentagon didn't want stuff when Xlinton was Pres and appointing One-Worlders and Bilderbergers like Wesley "Weasel" Clark to say what they did want is a PLUS.
The only articles I could find were ones from Left Wing Rags, like the Ultra Liberal paper in San Diego which has done everything except hide a reporter under his bed to discredit him. And it hasn't worked.
It looks and smells like a bullsh*t charge to me. Which is not to say Hunter has much of a chance, he doesn't. The big media won't even mention his name.
You'll get two CFR vetted candidates, just like always. Thanks for playing.
See my Posts 50 and 113.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.