Umm, no it wasn't RobfromGa, it was me you got in that discussion with, and it was also you who confused the meaning of assumption and prediction. I used the word assumption and you kept insisting I somehow meant prediction. You love to redefine words and then lie about history.
If you have nothing better that endless strings of personal attacks, then please don't bother. I've better things to do - like mow the lawn.
LOL, you are a tool. Aren't you the one coming off a three-day ban for referring to other posters as jacka$$e$? It is not a personal attack to point to your endless lies. Are you denying you wrongly called us liars many many times for exactly what you just admitted about Jorgenson? Of course getting you to admit your past mistakes is an impossible task even by pulling up your past posts and linking to them.
Just because the Mods don't remove your posts or ban you for them does not mean they are anything BUT personal attacks. Most people will certainly realize that and it seems to be part of the "debating tactic".
Actually it was both you and Robbie who were pretending that Jorgenson's assumptions were predictions of what would happen - and they weren't. You're welcome to misremember it as you like, though. I've had the discussion with both of you at different times.
"You love to redefine words and then lie about history."
The "word redefinition" you mention more correctly applies to the FairTax opponents who routinely - in fact, always - refer to the prebate as an "entitlement" when in fact it is a rebate and is so defined in both the bill HR25 and in dictionaries in that manner. The word "entitlement" has a different meaning than "rebate", so your little mini-lecture about "word redefinition" falls flat.
And it happens to be against FR Posting Guidelines to try to continue your personal attacks and taunting from thread to thread as you FairTax opponents routinely do. Look it up.