Just because the Mods don't remove your posts or ban you for them does not mean they are anything BUT personal attacks. Most people will certainly realize that and it seems to be part of the "debating tactic".
Actually it was both you and Robbie who were pretending that Jorgenson's assumptions were predictions of what would happen - and they weren't. You're welcome to misremember it as you like, though. I've had the discussion with both of you at different times.
"You love to redefine words and then lie about history."
The "word redefinition" you mention more correctly applies to the FairTax opponents who routinely - in fact, always - refer to the prebate as an "entitlement" when in fact it is a rebate and is so defined in both the bill HR25 and in dictionaries in that manner. The word "entitlement" has a different meaning than "rebate", so your little mini-lecture about "word redefinition" falls flat.
And it happens to be against FR Posting Guidelines to try to continue your personal attacks and taunting from thread to thread as you FairTax opponents routinely do. Look it up.
And it happens to be against FR Posting Guidelines to try to continue your personal attacks and taunting from thread to thread as you FairTax opponents routinely do. Look it up.This coming from a guy who's had his account suspended (what is it now?) three times (or is it four?).
Calling out your lies is not a personal attack, but pointing to the obvious. Let's go to your statement you just made:
PIGDOG: "Actually it was both you and Robbie who were pretending that Jorgenson's assumptions were predictions of what would happen"
Here is an example of the true history of this. In post 25 on that thread:
Always Right: "Leaving out the fact that all these analysis assume you have to take a wage cut is misleading at best."
I clearly identify it as an ASSUMPTION. Two posts later in post 27:
PIGDOG: "The fact that some assumed that he meant that would happen in real life doesn't alter the fact that he made no such prediction."
I clearly say Jorgenson assumed it, and then you turn aroudn and claim I said it was a prediction. You have done that over and over again and then you lie about what went down. You are the one who twists the truth. And it does not matter how many times it is pointed out to you in black and white, you still maintain your lies. You are impossible.