Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman
No, archaeology and closely related fields

When creos use these you evos say "no fair, no fair, that's from a creationist site or a creationist scientist's view". Admit it, you are selective.

878 posted on 09/25/2006 11:27:40 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 872 | View Replies ]


To: taxesareforever
When creos use these you evos say "no fair, no fair, that's from a creationist site or a creationist scientist's view". Admit it, you are selective.

Yes, it helps if you actually use science to disprove science.

Therefore, yes, being selective is an excellent way to skip the rubbish and get right down to the real nitty gritty, which is this, science must be used to disprove science, and so far I have yet to see any from the creationist side.

I see a lot of, because I believe, or there is a creationist that says this, or there is an Id'r that says that. It doesn't work.

If you have actual scientific evidence to disprove evolution, trot it on out there, you might win the nobel prize.

879 posted on 09/25/2006 11:40:13 PM PDT by Jaguarbhzrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 878 | View Replies ]

To: taxesareforever

Admit it, you are selective.
= = = =

Selective perception is an interesting psychological phenomena. . . . not unlike a mule with blinders on.

Speaking of mules with blinders on . . .


915 posted on 09/26/2006 5:51:00 AM PDT by Quix (LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 878 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson