But your attempt at Christian theology as described in that example (unless it was attempted humor) is about as piss-poor as many of the cre's strawman attacks on evolution.
Incidentally, if you *are* posting this seriously, aren't you lending credence to the view expressed by some that evolution *is* an attack on the Gospel?
Your post 1371 is claiming that taking the scientific evidence seriously is a trap set up by God in order to condemn people.
Since the Gospel is (by definition) meant to "save" people, and acceptance of science (by your words, a metaphoric "trap") leads to Hell, then by definition acceptance of science is opposed to the Goals of the Gospel. QED.
Hint: The way out of the Gordian knot, btw, is that your formulation (sarcastic or not) misrepresented a couple of things. Think it over. Or as the old joke goes, "God told Moses: take two tablets and call me in the morning."
Cheers!
Oh good grief. If you had read the conversation between FreedomProtector and me, you would have understood my post.