[Ichneumon]

...and for the umteenth time, how did something explode from nothing?

...and for the "umteenth time", your question is grossly flawed, this has been explained to you over and over again.

The astute reader will note that "sirchtruth" has already been told numerous times before that the Big Bang neither involved an "explosion", nor "something from nothing". Here for example is one of my own prior posts informing him of this fact:

Posted by Ichneumon to sirchtruth
On Smoky Backroom 12/17/2005 7:06:50 PM CST · 536 of 2,129

but they'll believe SOMETHING exploded from NOTHING?

Your poor understanding of the Big Bang is as bad as your misunderstandings about most other topics. The Big Bang neither involved an "explosion", or something coming from "nothing". Try learning some physics before you attempt to critique it.

These same people who champion the theory would be the first ones to decry any halftruth in any other field!

Indeed, which is why we decry halftruths (and "notruths") in creationism as well. Thanks for noticing.

For more information, see:

Misconceptions about the Big Bang: Baffled by the expansion of the universe? You're not alone

Evidence for the Big Bang (contains a lot of clarifications on the actual process as well as evidence)

Whether or not "sirchtruth" (now *there's* an inapt screen name) keeps repeating the same inane and double fallacious question over and over again out of a desire to be deceptive, or a complete inability to grasp what it is that modern physics actually says about the earliest moments of the Universe, is left as an exercise for the reader. In any case, he's unfortunately exhibiting the typical behavior of the anti-science crank -- "never mind what science really says about something, I've got my talking points and I'm sticking to them!"

[RightWhale]

I believe the posts in question are merely placing an identification sign in a thread to signify that it has been seen and marked. My dog told me to say this.

[sirchtruth]

You are completely clueless! Just because YOU post some farcial explanation doesn't mean everyone has to buy it, hook, line, and sinker? What an arrogant prick to think YOUR explanation is the END ALL explanation, especially when you were not around to witness an event. Your opinion, and research (bad ones at that), don't explain jack! You may have an convoluted explanation, but it's not fact, or are you totally deluded in the cult of evo to realize this?

BTW, it's ALL opinion, no fact. You actually have yet to show a FACT. Way to keep track of meaningless post, you must be so proud of yourself! Welcome to FAITH 101!