Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: BrandtMichaels

It is fine to teach theories that do not support evolution as long as those theories are scientifically based. Mystical theories against eveolution have no place in the sceince class room.


182 posted on 07/27/2006 6:07:42 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon (Is tractus pro pensio.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Gordon
It is fine to teach theories that do not support evolution as long as those theories are scientifically based. Mystical theories against eveolution have no place in the sceince class room.

Nobody is talking about teaching mythology in science classes. What people ARE talking about is Intelligent Design, which is clearly a testable scientific hypothesis and, in many instances, all anybody has wanted to do was insert one page or a sticker in highschool biology books noting that there was a controversy involving evolution, and that about half the American populace remains unconvinced of it which is true.

EVEN THAT much of a request is seen as an overwhelming threat by the evos and they go running off to the ACLU (Anti-American Commie Libertine Union) and their little crooked judges with lawsuits at the least hint of somebody acting as if there were any question on the subject.

188 posted on 07/27/2006 6:12:02 PM PDT by tomzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Gordon

Well I've seen very many anti-evolutionary arguments based upon Math, Physics, Probability & Statistics, the Laws of Thermodynamics, the Fossil record, etc.

Maybe just start listing the assumptions that must be accpeted in order for evolution to be true? 'Strain at a nat but swallow a camel...'


831 posted on 07/28/2006 9:07:06 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson