it doesn't matter how many times you try and express that there is no debate concerning toe. You simply saying that doesn't make it true as many, not just a few, bright scientists see the falicy of toe and are very much in the debate. It would be good for you to at least acknowledge that. It's the "there's no debate" kind of dark thinking that is responsible for a big lack of academic freedom in science classes in public schools.
The debate is between religious belief and evolutionary science.
If you don't think this is correct, go to a good university library and find the floors devoted to evolutionary science and see what kind of debate you find in the many journals.
Hint: You won't find creation "science" because it is not science. Same for ID.
They are Not Science! They are apologetics (defense of religion).
many bright scientists, eh?
you refer to the DI's paltry little list of "scientists" who have some vague and unspecified dissatisfaction with natural selection?
ever heard of "project steve" and the ratio it indicates?
Biologists with qualms about the ToE are outnumbered about 5000 to 1 by those with no such qualms.
Moreover, qualms do not equate to a scientific challenge.
Without a scientific challenge, there is no debate.
oh, by the way - you have STILL not attempted to answer the three specific questions I posed to you several days ago, despite multiple reminders.