Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Fester Chugabrew
Is there some obvious reason I should reject the plain and simple statement that, in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth, and that it took six normal days to take care of the set up?

There are many obvious reasons, detailed thousands of times in thousands of science textbooks. They are why I reject interpreting Genesis literally. I do not reject God; I embrace Him because His embrace of me is everything. He endowed me and my fellow humans with the ability to reason, study the world around us, increase knowledge, draw conclusions, pursue truth. Anyone who must engage in denial and deception to justify what they define as "true" faith in God, is a dupe of a well-disguised devil.

1,228 posted on 07/29/2006 1:16:43 PM PDT by Finny (God continue to Bless President G.W. Bush with wisdom, popularity, safety and success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]


To: Finny
Anyone who must engage in denial and deception to justify what they define as "true" faith in God

Don't forget abuse!

1,267 posted on 07/29/2006 6:03:57 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1228 | View Replies ]

To: Finny
There are many obvious reasons, detailed thousands of times in thousands of science textbooks.

Why in particular should one accept the thousands of science textbooks as more authoritative and accurate than the biblical texts? Is it their great number? Is it because you were not present to experience six days of creation and thus weigh your experience in time as more authoritative?

1,344 posted on 07/30/2006 12:56:14 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson