[DannyTN]

"How do you explain the dinosaur bones dating back millions of years? Do you take Adam and Eve literally or figuratively? "

Yes I take Adam and Eve literally.

I can't explain the dinosaurs dating back millions of years. Alternative explanations have been offered but I presume that the dating is wrong. I cannot prove the dating is wrong at this time. There are evidences that cast doubt on the dating such as...

• Radio-isotope halos
• Too much carbon in fossilized organic matter
• Ignatious rock from recent volcanic flows dated at millions of years old.
• Circular thinking with regard to dating (The fossils are old therefore the geologic layer is old. And since the geologic layer is old, the fossils must be old.)
• Discordant dates for the same rocks using different methods.
• The financial incentive that older finds get more funding.
• Animals believed to have been extinct for millions of years according to the fossil record found alive and well.

There were some very prescient aspects to the biblical story

There is quite a bit of scientific information that is in the Bible that is not believed to have been science available 2500B.C.

Science in the Bible

[freedumb2003]

Science in the Bible

That is one of the funniest links I have ever read.

It takes the poetry of the already-known-to-be-mistranslated King James Bible and says it is "science?"

Case in point (just an example or perhaps an exemplar):

The bible includes reasonably complete descriptions of the hydrologic cycle.[3]

• Psalm 135:7 He causes the vapors to ascend from the ends of the earth;
  He makes lightning for the rain; He brings the wind out of His treasuries.

That is no more a description of th hydrological cycle than Ook Grunt would have seen from his Cro Magnon cave.

Id doesn't descrbe (or enen mention) evaporation and how they form into clouds. No mention of Hydrogen/Oxygen, Heat Exchange. It doesn't describe any PROCESS at all. It merely notes clouds happen and rain happens.

The rest of the site is equally hilarious.

But thanks for the laugh. I hope you didn't use these so-called "Biblical science" references for any actual science classes.