"and how does "looking around at the wonders of nature" prove the existence of that specific deity, with all of its specific attributes, and no other?"
So I take it you don't believe in God, correct?
Since you won't accept my evidence, there's really no point in continuing, correct?
Can you prove that God didn't have a hand in the formation of the earth?
So I take it you don't believe in God, correct?
So I take it you're not going to answer the question which points out problems in your reasoning, correct?
Since you won't accept my evidence, there's really no point in continuing, correct?
He didn't say he wouldn't accept your evidence. He said you haven't provided any so far. And he's correct. Make sure you understand what actually constitutes "evidence". I'm afraid that saying, "wow, look out that window!" doesn't even begin to qualify.
Can you prove that God didn't have a hand in the formation of the earth?
Can you prove that Huitzilopochtli, Isis, Odin, Sutekh, Dis, Zeus, Brahma, Ra, Athene, Shin-Mu, Blodewedd, Prajnaparamita, Tara, or Minerva didn't have a hand in the formation of the Earth? No? Wow, then *they* must exist too! Oh, wait, maybe there's something wrong with your so-called "reasoning"...
Now why don't you take another whack at the question you were asked?