Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Dimensio

"and how does "looking around at the wonders of nature" prove the existence of that specific deity, with all of its specific attributes, and no other?"

So I take it you don't believe in God, correct?

Since you won't accept my evidence, there's really no point in continuing, correct?

Can you prove that God didn't have a hand in the formation of the earth?


659 posted on 04/28/2006 11:21:36 AM PDT by swmobuffalo (The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies ]


To: swmobuffalo
So I take it you don't believe in God, correct?

I lack belief in all deity constructs presented thus far.

Since you won't accept my evidence, there's really no point in continuing, correct?

You have yet to provide any evidence, so you cannot claim to know that I will not accept your evidence.

Can you prove that God didn't have a hand in the formation of the earth?

Your question requires clarification regarding the "God" to which you refer. For some definitions of "God", I can provide evidence against such a thing. For others, I cannot, however neither situation qualifies as evidence for your position.
675 posted on 04/28/2006 11:53:52 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies ]

To: swmobuffalo; Dimensio; ahayes; js1138; Coyoteman; PatrickHenry
["and how does "looking around at the wonders of nature" prove the existence of that specific deity, with all of its specific attributes, and no other?"]

So I take it you don't believe in God, correct?

So I take it you're not going to answer the question which points out problems in your reasoning, correct?

Since you won't accept my evidence, there's really no point in continuing, correct?

He didn't say he wouldn't accept your evidence. He said you haven't provided any so far. And he's correct. Make sure you understand what actually constitutes "evidence". I'm afraid that saying, "wow, look out that window!" doesn't even begin to qualify.

Can you prove that God didn't have a hand in the formation of the earth?

Can you prove that Huitzilopochtli, Isis, Odin, Sutekh, Dis, Zeus, Brahma, Ra, Athene, Shin-Mu, Blodewedd, Prajnaparamita, Tara, or Minerva didn't have a hand in the formation of the Earth? No? Wow, then *they* must exist too! Oh, wait, maybe there's something wrong with your so-called "reasoning"...

Now why don't you take another whack at the question you were asked?

801 posted on 04/28/2006 6:06:19 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson