Replies

Oh but to be pinged when quoted by name or spoken of, but rules apply only to some.

According to Genesis, which describes Christ as the 'tree of life' already existing in the Garden of God, called Eden. Christ is referenced again as the one to have His heel bruised, and Eve called the mother of all living as Christ was to come through her in the flesh.

The Garden of God, Eden is referenced in Ezekiel 28:13 describing that pretender, the 'tree of the knowledge of good and evil' also called the serpent a term of degradation that Paul says in IICorinthians 11:3 "beguiled" (the Greek word used has a specific meaning) Eve.

Maybe this evolution debate will drive Christians to do some spiritual digging into what the original Hebrew contains about creation, exactly who was created, and that life began when that breath of life "soul" was placed into the nostrils of man in flesh.

Now why would not the 'gods of the knowledge' of evolution, not show the Christians what exactly the first six chapters of Genesis actually says in that original Hebrew??????????

Oh but to be pinged when quoted by name or spoken of, but rules apply only to some.

What "rule" would that be? Oh, right, there isn't one.

It can be a *courtesy* (not a "rule") to ping someone if their post is quoted, but a) you have posted enough insulting material that I owe you no courtesy, b) it's not as if I employed your post in a way that you would find objectionable or requiring rebuttal, I just included it to show that there are indeed people who hold the position you do (please don't try to claim that you object to having your public opinions made public...), and c) I wasn't interested in having the thread dragged farther afield by having you and your fellows pop in to add to the noise. And sure enough here you are with the same old routine. It has already been dealt with before, and I'm not going to waste time on it now.

But hey, if you wnt to argue with someone, and you clearly do, go take it up with wallcrawlr. He said, with regard to the notion that "a belief in evolution is incompatible with conservatism and a belief in God", and I quote, "It isnt. PERIOD." Let's you and him fight it out and get back to me when you come to a consistent position, m'kay? Until then, I'm not too impressed with your absolute claims to know what the Bible actually says, since it disagrees so much with other people's claims to know what the Bible says. Or as someone once pointed out, "So long as man is still in flesh, there will be the argument over what the Bible does in fact say and instruct.". Oh, wait, that was you, wasn't it?