Nah, we more often point out how their argument is inaccurate, shallow, or irrelevant to reality.
"o surprise there. So please forgive me for laughing at your continued, tiring "proof.""
Good point. To me its like saying "I say this color is red, if you don't believe its red then you are ignorant."
...and never *once* actually dealt with the material.
I know you evos keep these articles handy to post again and again to show how all the evidence proves evolution. Blah blah blah
...and to show how incapable you anti-science folks are of actually addressing the material, how pathetically you "respond" to it, how childish is your level of "discourse" (e.g. "blah blah blah") when asked to deal with the actual evidence you slander on a daily basis. You folks are like children trying to argue against quantum mechanics.
And any time someone posts opinions from scientists who disagree with TOE, you and others point out how unqualified they really are.
No, actually, we don't. We deal with their *material* and show how false, misleading, or fallacious it is. Additionally, we also show that while you were trying to offer so-and-so's musings in a cheap attempt at "argument from authority", the folks you people fling around as your anti-evolution "authorities" usually aren't even speaking within their own fields of knowledge.
I've lost count of the number of times an anti-evolutionist dragged in someone and claimed they were an "expert" on the topic and how dare we disagree with him, only to have it turn out that the guy was, say, a geologist commenting on biochemistry.
No surprise there. So please forgive me for laughing at your continued, tiring "proof."
Yeah, laugh instead of actually address it -- as always. Pathetic.