Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Fester Chugabrew
Such objections ought to be allowed and considered, but they should enjoy no more standing by law than any other philosophy that touches upon ultimate purpose or non-purpose, design or non-design, intelligence or non-intelligence, that may or may not comprise objective reality.

Great! You go play with this in the philosophy classes and leave scientists alone. Then we'll all be happy.

928 posted on 04/23/2006 4:39:23 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Interim tagline: The UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 927 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

That would be fine if it were not true that every individual is committed to a phislophy first, and science second. As it stands, you are no less subject to errors of perception and enunciation than anyone else, so climb down off that high horse of yours and enjoy a dose of another reality you are inclined to deny: you are a philosopher first, and a scientist second.


931 posted on 04/23/2006 4:45:19 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 928 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson