I can dig it. Isn't that what Dembski is driving at in his work - some way of getting at or describing "eternal truths" mathematically, in his case regarding "design"?
One of the fundamental claims of the IDers is that it's possible to construct mathematical tests that distinguish between designed things and natural things. I haven't ever seen such a thing, but if someday somebody comes up with such a test, I'll be glad to consider it. But right now I have no reason to believe that such a test is possible. All I know is that Dembski, et al. want one, and that they expect it to tell them that organisms are designed and not natural.
Nah. Dembski's "work" is getting rich off of suckers.