As you so easily pointed out, you can look at the 'data' EITHER way and STILL make the same Evo claim!
You are completely, utterly, absolutely, unconscionably, unspeakably, and mind-numbingly WRONG.
And if that isn't clear, let me state again: WRONG.
There's a clue in the way the examplars in the chart are labeled, starting with 'A' for the earliest and coming forward in time.
Time--on earth, at least--is indeed unidirectional; perhaps it is different on the strange little solipsistic planet you appear to inhabit.
But you are absolutely correct to reject the concept you hold of the theory of evolution, for it is painfully clear that your concept of ToE bears absolutely no similarity to the ToE of science. If you honestly believe, as you have stated, that "you can look at the 'data' EITHER way and STILL make the same Evo claim," then your simple choice is surely:
[1] Take the time to actually find out what the theory of evolution is, and replace your appalling ingorance with a dose of education, or
[2] Leave it alone altogether. You can always amuse yourself, as you did earlier on this thread, by really cheap, nasty and offensive shots of calling folks Nazis (something I regularly encounter from liberals, who have no conception of how ugly and demeaning that is to millions of people who suffered at the hands of real Nazis).